Influence of exposure protocol, voxel size, and artifact removal algorithm on the trueness of segmentation utilizing an artificial-intelligence-based system
dc.contributor.author | Alrashed, Safa | |
dc.contributor.author | Dutra, Vinicius | |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, Tien-Min G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Chao-Chieh | |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Wei-Shao | |
dc.contributor.department | Biomedical and Applied Sciences, School of Dentistry | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-07T20:58:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-07T20:58:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-07 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose To evaluate the effects of exposure protocol, voxel sizes, and artifact removal algorithms on the trueness of segmentation in various mandible regions using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system. Materials and methods Eleven dry human mandibles were scanned using a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner under differing exposure protocols (standard and ultra-low), voxel sizes (0.15 mm, 0.3 mm, and 0.45 mm), and with or without artifact removal algorithm. The resulting datasets were segmented using an AI-based system, exported as 3D models, and compared to reference files derived from a white-light laboratory scanner. Deviation measurement was performed using a computer-aided design (CAD) program and recorded as root mean square (RMS). The RMS values were used as a representation of the trueness of the AI-segmented 3D models. A 4-way ANOVA was used to assess the impact of voxel size, exposure protocol, artifact removal algorithm, and location on RMS values (α = 0.05). Results Significant effects were found with voxel size (p < 0.001) and location (p < 0.001), but not with exposure protocol (p = 0.259) or artifact removal algorithm (p = 0.752). Standard exposure groups had significantly lower RMS values than the ultra-low exposure groups in the mandible body with 0.3 mm (p = 0.014) or 0.45 mm (p < 0.001) voxel sizes, the symphysis with a 0.45 mm voxel size (p = 0.011), and the whole mandible with a 0.45 mm voxel size (p = 0.001). Exposure protocol did not affect RMS values at teeth and alveolar bone (p = 0.544), mandible angles (p = 0.380), condyles (p = 0.114), and coronoids (p = 0.806) locations. Conclusion This study informs optimal exposure protocol and voxel size choices in CBCT imaging for true AI-based automatic segmentation with minimal radiation. The artifact removal algorithm did not influence the trueness of AI segmentation. When using an ultra-low exposure protocol to minimize patient radiation exposure in AI segmentations, a voxel size of 0.15 mm is recommended, while a voxel size of 0.45 mm should be avoided. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alrashed, S., Dutra, V., Chu, T.-M. G., Yang, C.-C., & Lin, W.-S. (2024). Influence of exposure protocol, voxel size, and artifact removal algorithm on the trueness of segmentation utilizing an artificial-intelligence-based system. Journal of Prosthodontics, 33(6), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13827 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/45701 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Wiley | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1111/jopr.13827 | |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Prosthodontics | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
dc.source | Publisher | |
dc.subject | cone beam computed tomography | |
dc.subject | CBCT | |
dc.subject | AI segmentation | |
dc.title | Influence of exposure protocol, voxel size, and artifact removal algorithm on the trueness of segmentation utilizing an artificial-intelligence-based system | |
dc.type | Article |