Autographs for Freedom and Reaching a New Abolitionist Audience

If you need an accessible version of this item, please submit a remediation request.
Date
2017-01-01
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
University of Chicago Press
Abstract

Scholars correctly appreciate Frederick Douglass’s novella The Heroic Slave (1853) as an important early work of African American literature and as a significant indicator of its author’s endorsement of violent tactics to end slavery in the United States.1 This essay will literally step back farther from the text of Douglass’s only fictional work, and examine The Heroic Slave as a component of a larger project—the gift book Autographs for Freedom—edited by Douglass and his closest ally in the early 1850s, British abolitionist Julia Griffiths. The thirty-nine pieces of short fiction, poetry, essays, and correspondence in the 263-page anthology were envisioned as tools to construct a wider and politically more potent antislavery alliance than any in which the two abolitionists had previously participated. In the diverse composition of its collection of authors and antislavery themes, Autographs for Freedom was both a cultural and political tool designed by Douglass and Griffiths to help assemble a more powerful antislavery coalition from the volume’s reading audience.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
McKivigan, J. R., & Pattillo, R. A. (2017). Autographs for Freedom and Reaching a New Abolitionist Audience. The Journal of African American History, 102(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.5323/jafriamerhist.102.1.0035
ISSN
1548-1867
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
The Journal of African American History
Source
Publisher
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}