Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant Referral and Evaluation among Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Georgia

dc.contributor.authorRoss-Driscoll, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorAyuk-Arrey, Arrey-Takor
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Raymond
dc.contributor.authorMcCullough, Lauren E.
dc.contributor.authorRoccaro, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorNephew, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorHundley, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorRubin, Raymond A.
dc.contributor.authorPatzer, Rachel
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T14:09:46Z
dc.date.available2024-07-08T14:09:46Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractLiver transplantation offers the best survival for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prior studies have demonstrated disparities in transplant access; none have examined the early steps of the transplant process. We identified determinants of access to transplant referral and evaluation among patients with HCC with a single tumor either within Milan or meeting downstaging criteria in Georgia.Population-based cancer registry data from 2010 to 2019 were linked to liver transplant centers in Georgia. Primary cohort: adult patients with HCC with a single tumor ≤8 cm in diameter, no extrahepatic involvement, and no vascular involvement. Secondary cohort: primary cohort plus patients with multiple tumors confined to one lobe. We estimated time to transplant referral, evaluation initiation, and evaluation completion, accounting for the competing risk of death. In sensitivity analyses, we also accounted for non-transplant cancer treatment.Among 1,379 patients with early-stage HCC in Georgia, 26% were referred to liver transplant. Private insurance and younger age were associated with increased likelihood of referral, while requiring downstaging was associated with lower likelihood of referral. Patients living in census tracts with ≥20% of residents in poverty were less likely to initiate evaluation among those referred [cause-specific hazard ratio (csHR): 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.94]. Medicaid patients were less likely to complete the evaluation once initiated (csHR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32-0.89).Different sociodemographic factors were associated with each stage of the transplant process among patients with early-stage HCC in Georgia, emphasizing unique barriers to access and the need for targeted interventions at each step. Significance: Among patients with early-stage HCC in Georgia, age and insurance type were associated with referral to liver transplant, race, and poverty with evaluation initiation, and insurance type with evaluation completion. Opportunities to improve transplant access include informing referring providers about insurance requirements, addressing barriers to evaluation initiation, and streamlining the evaluation process.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationRoss-Driscoll K, Ayuk-Arrey AT, Lynch R, et al. Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant Referral and Evaluation among Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Georgia. Cancer Res Commun. 2024;4(4):1111-1119. doi:10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0541
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/42060
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Cancer Research
dc.relation.isversionof10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0541
dc.relation.journalCancer Research Communications
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectHepatocellular carcinoma
dc.subjectLiver neoplasms
dc.subjectHealthcare disparities
dc.subjectHealth services accessibility
dc.titleDisparities in Access to Liver Transplant Referral and Evaluation among Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Georgia
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RossDriscoll2024Disparities-CCBY.pdf
Size:
3.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: