Comparison of porcine corneal decellularization methods and importance of preserving corneal limbus through decellularization

dc.contributor.authorIsidan, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Shaohui
dc.contributor.authorChen, Angela M.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Wenjun
dc.contributor.authorLi, Ping
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Lester J.
dc.contributor.authorHara, Hidetaka
dc.contributor.authorCooper, David K. C.
dc.contributor.authorEkser, Burcin
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T18:18:54Z
dc.date.available2022-06-15T18:18:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-05
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study is to compare the three previously applied, conventional porcine corneal decellularization methods and to demonstrate the importance of preserving the corneal limbus through decellularization. Methods: Fresh, wild-type (with or without) limbus porcine corneas were decellularized using three different methods, including (i) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), (ii) hypertonic saline (HS), and (iii) N2 gas (NG). Post-treatment evaluation was carried out using histological, residual nuclear material, and ultrastructural analyses. Glycerol was used to help reduce the adverse effects of decellularization. The corneas were preserved for two weeks in cornea storage medium. Results: All three decellularization methods reduced the number of keratocytes at different rates in the stromal tissue. However, all methods, except SDS, resulted in the retention of large numbers of cells and cell fragments. The SDS method (0.1% SDS, 48h) resulted in almost 100% decellularization in corneas without limbus. Low decellularization capacity of the NG method (<50%) could make it unfavorable. Although HS method had a more balanced damage-decellularization ratio, its decellularization capacity was lower than SDS method. Preservation of the corneoscleral limbus could partially prevent structural damage and edema, but it would reduce the decellularization capacity. Conclusion: Our results suggest that SDS is a very powerful decellularization method, but it damages the cornea irreversibly. Preserving the corneoscleral limbus reduces the efficiency of decellularization, but also reduces the damage.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationIsidan A, Liu S, Chen AM, et al. Comparison of porcine corneal decellularization methods and importance of preserving corneal limbus through decellularization. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0243682. Published 2021 Mar 5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243682en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/29355
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1371/journal.pone.0243682en_US
dc.relation.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCorneaen_US
dc.subjectExtracellular matrixen_US
dc.subjectLimbus corneaeen_US
dc.subjectSodium dodecyl sulfateen_US
dc.titleComparison of porcine corneal decellularization methods and importance of preserving corneal limbus through decellularizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pone.0243682.pdf
Size:
1.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: