Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device

dc.contributor.authorSumida, Iori
dc.contributor.authorYamaguchi, Hajime
dc.contributor.authorDas, Indra J.
dc.contributor.authorKizaki, Hisao
dc.contributor.authorAboshi, Keiko
dc.contributor.authorTsujii, Mari
dc.contributor.authorYamada, Yuji
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Osamu
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Yuji
dc.contributor.authorIsohashi, Fumiaki
dc.contributor.authorOgawa, Kazuhiko
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-16T19:20:09Z
dc.date.available2016-08-16T19:20:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractPatient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification is essential. The aim of this study is to provide a new method based on the relative error distribution by comparing the fluence map from the treatment planning system (TPS) and the incident fluence deconvolved from the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images. This method is validated for 10 head and neck IMRT cases. The fluence map of each beam was exported from the TPS and EPID images of the treatment beams were acquired. Measured EPID images were deconvolved to the incident fluence with proper corrections. The relative error distribution between the TPS fluence map and the incident fluence from the EPID was created. This was also created for a 2D diode array detector. The absolute point dose was measured with an ionization chamber, and the dose distribution was measured by a radiochromic film. In three cases, MLC leaf positions were intentionally changed to create the dose error as much as 5% against the planned dose and our fluence-based method was tested using gamma index. Absolute errors between the predicted dose of 2D diode detector and of our method and measure­ments were 1.26% ± 0.65% and 0.78% ± 0.81% respectively. The gamma passing rate (3% global / 3 mm) of the TPS was higher than that of the 2D diode detector (p< 0.02), and lower than that of the EPID (p < 0.04). The gamma passing rate (2% global / 2 mm) of the TPS was higher than that of the 2D diode detector, while the gamma passing rate of the TPS was lower than that of EPID (p < 0.02). For three modified plans, the predicted dose errors against the measured dose were 1.10%, 2.14%, and -0.87%. The predicted dose distributions from the EPID were well matched to the measurements. Our fluence-based method provides very accurate dosimetry for IMRT patients. The method is simple and can be adapted to any clinic for complex cases.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationSumida, I., Yamaguchi, H., Das, I. J., Kizaki, H., Aboshi, K., Tsujii, M., ... & Ogawa, K. (2016). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 17(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5899en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/10705
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5899en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physicsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectIMRTen_US
dc.subjectEPIDen_US
dc.subjectdose reconstructionen_US
dc.titleIntensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging deviceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sumida_2016_intensity.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: