Use of Ultrasound in the Prehospital Setting: A Scoping Review

dc.contributor.authorWarren, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorTamhankar, Omkar
dc.contributor.authorToy, Jake
dc.contributor.authorSchlesinger, Shira A.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yiju Teresa
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T10:46:29Z
dc.date.available2025-04-22T10:46:29Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: With the advent of portable devices, prehospital ultrasound is increasingly available and has the potential to provide clinical and procedural decision support. This scoping review seeks to examine current literature on prehospital ultrasound, including study indications, the level of the health care professionals performing prehospital ultrasound, and reported research outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for research articles and conference abstracts focused on prehospital ultrasound with scans performed in the field. After title/abstract screening by 2 independent reviewers, a full-text review was performed. We excluded reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, and research published in nonEnglish language. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: We identified 9718 unique articles, and 109 were included after title/abstract review (Kappa 0.68) and full-text analysis. Annual publications increased yearly (P < .01). Nineteen countries were represented, with the United States having the highest number of publications (n = 34, 31.2%). Most studies were prospective (n = 74, 67.9%) with few randomized control trials (n = 6, 5.5%). Feasibility studies comprised 45.9% (n = 50) of the included publications, while clinical outcomes were the primary interest in 18 studies (16.5%). Physicians (n = 58, 53.2%) and paramedics (n = 38, 34.9%) were the most studied prehospital clinicians. The most common indication was trauma (n = 49, 45%) followed by dyspnea (n = 13, 11.9%) and cardiac emergencies (n = 10, 9.2%). Conclusion: There is a growing, heterogeneous body of literature describing the use of prehospital ultrasound. Published literature was primarily prospective and described feasibility trials. Identified gaps include a lack of studies in pediatric patients and research identifying clinical outcomes.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationWarren J, Tamhankar O, Toy J, Schlesinger SA, Liu YT. Use of Ultrasound in the Prehospital Setting: A Scoping Review. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025;6(2):100086. Published 2025 Mar 1. doi:10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100086
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/47276
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100086
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.subjectPOCUS
dc.subjectEmergency medical services
dc.subjectPrehospital care
dc.titleUse of Ultrasound in the Prehospital Setting: A Scoping Review
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Warren2025Use-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
1023.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: