Assessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider

dc.contributor.authorHoke, Tanya P.
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Alexander A.
dc.contributor.authorPan, Christine C.
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Lindsey A.
dc.contributor.authorWinkelman, William D.
dc.contributor.authorHigh, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorVolpe, Katherine A.
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chee Paul
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Holly E.
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T17:00:13Z
dc.date.available2020-10-09T17:00:13Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-11
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis Understanding patient preferences regarding provider characteristics is an under-explored area in urogynecology. This study aims to describe patient preferences for urogynecologic care, including provider gender, age, experience, and presence of medical trainees. Methods This was a multicenter, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient preferences with a voluntary, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire prior to their first urogynecology consult. A 5-point Likert scale addressing provider gender, age, experience, and presence of trainees was used. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and provider preferences. Chi-squared (or Fisher’s exact) test was used to test for associations. Results Six hundred fifteen women participated from eight sites including all geographic regions across the US; 70.8% identified as white with mean age of 58.5 ± 14.2 years. Urinary incontinence was the most commonly reported symptom (45.9%); 51.4% saw a female provider. The majority of patients saw a provider 45–60 years old (42.8%) with > 15 years’ experience (60.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients preferred a female provider; 10% preferred a male provider. Sixteen percent preferred a provider < 45 years old, 36% preferred 45–60 years old, and 11% of patients preferred a provider > 60 years old. Most patients preferred a provider with 5–15 or > 15 years’ experience (49% and 46%, respectively). Eleven percent preferred the presence of trainees while 24% preferred trainee absence. Conclusion Patient preferences regarding urogynecologic providers included female gender and provider age 45–60 years old with > 5 years’ experience. Further study is needed to identify qualitative components associated with these preferences.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationAssessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provideren_US
dc.identifier.issn1433-3023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/24032
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00192-019-04189-0en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Urogynecology Journalen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectFemale pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeryen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.subjectMedical learnersen_US
dc.subjectPatient preferencesen_US
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectUrogynecologyen_US
dc.titleAssessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provideren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1064582.pdf
Size:
542.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: