Meta-Analytic Use of Balanced Identity Theory to Validate the Implicit Association Test

dc.contributor.authorCvencek, Dario
dc.contributor.authorMeltzoff, Andrew N.
dc.contributor.authorMaddox, Craig D.
dc.contributor.authorNosek, Brian A.
dc.contributor.authorRudman, Laurie A.
dc.contributor.authorDevos, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorDunham, Yarrow
dc.contributor.authorBaron, Andrew S.
dc.contributor.authorSteffens, Melanie C.
dc.contributor.authorLane, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorHorcajo, Javier
dc.contributor.authorAshburn-Nardo, Leslie
dc.contributor.authorQuinby, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorSrivastava, Sameer B.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorAidman, Eugene
dc.contributor.authorTang, Emilie
dc.contributor.authorFarnham, Shelly
dc.contributor.authorMellott, Deborah S.
dc.contributor.authorBanaji, Mahzarin R.
dc.contributor.authorGreenwald, Anthony G.
dc.contributor.departmentPsychology, School of Science
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-06T15:37:11Z
dc.date.available2024-03-06T15:37:11Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThis meta-analysis evaluated theoretical predictions from balanced identity theory (BIT) and evaluated the validity of zero points of Implicit Association Test (IAT) and self-report measures used to test these predictions. Twenty-one researchers contributed individual subject data from 36 experiments (total N = 12,773) that used both explicit and implicit measures of the social-cognitive constructs. The meta-analysis confirmed predictions of BIT's balance-congruity principle and simultaneously validated interpretation of the IAT's zero point as indicating absence of preference between two attitude objects. Statistical power afforded by the sample size enabled the first confirmations of balance-congruity predictions with self-report measures. Beyond these empirical results, the meta-analysis introduced a within-study statistical test of the balance-congruity principle, finding that it had greater efficiency than the previous best method. The meta-analysis's full data set has been publicly archived to enable further studies of interrelations among attitudes, stereotypes, and identities.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationCvencek D, Meltzoff AN, Maddox CD, et al. Meta-Analytic Use of Balanced Identity Theory to Validate the Implicit Association Test. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021;47(2):185-200. doi:10.1177/0146167220916631
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/39066
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSage
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0146167220916631
dc.relation.journalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePublisher
dc.subjectImplicit Association Test
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.subjectIdentity
dc.subjectSelf-esteem
dc.subjectStereotypes
dc.titleMeta-Analytic Use of Balanced Identity Theory to Validate the Implicit Association Test
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
qt4g4348vr.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: