Contrasting Metacognitive, Social Cognitive and Alexithymia Profiles in Adults with Borderline Personality Disorder, Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorder

dc.contributor.authorLysaker, Paul H.
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Sunita
dc.contributor.authorChaudoin-Patzoldt, Kelly A.
dc.contributor.authorPec, Ondrej
dc.contributor.authorBob, Petr
dc.contributor.authorLeonhardt, Bethany L.
dc.contributor.authorVohs, Jenifer L.
dc.contributor.authorJames, Alison V.
dc.contributor.authorWickett, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorBuck, Kelly D.
dc.contributor.authorDimaggio, Giancarlo
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T14:54:16Z
dc.date.available2017-09-20T14:54:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.description.abstractDeficits in the ability to recognize and think about mental states are broadly understood to be a root cause of dysfunction in Borderline Personality Disorder (PD). This study compared the magnitude of those deficits relative to other forms of serious mental illness or psychiatric conditions. Assessments were performed using the metacognition assessment scale-abbreviated (MAS-A), emotion recognition using the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Test and alexithymia using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale among adults with schizophrenia (n = 65), Borderline PD (n = 34) and Substance Use disorder without psychosis or significant Borderline traits (n = 32). ANCOVA controlling for age revealed the Borderline PD group had significantly greater levels of metacognitive capacity on the MAS-A than the schizophrenia group and significantly lower levels of metacognitive capacity than the Substance Use group. Multiple comparisons revealed the Borderline PD group had significantly higher self-reflectivity and awareness of the other's mind than the schizophrenia group but lesser mastery and decentration on the MAS-A than substance use group, after controlling for self-report of psychopathology and overall number of PD traits. The Borderline PD and Schizophrenia group had significantly higher levels of alexithymia than the substance use group. No differences were found for emotion recognition. Results suggest metacognitive functioning is differentially affected in different mental disorders.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationLysaker, P. H., George, S., Chaudoin–Patzoldt, K. A., Pec, O., Bob, P., Leonhardt, B., … Dimaggio, G. (2017). Contrasting Metacognitive, Social Cognitive and Alexithymia Profiles in Adults with Borderline Personality Disorder, Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorder. Psychiatry Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/14128
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.001en_US
dc.relation.journalPsychiatry Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectschizophreniaen_US
dc.subjectsubstance use disordersen_US
dc.subjectBorderline Personality Disorderen_US
dc.titleContrasting Metacognitive, Social Cognitive and Alexithymia Profiles in Adults with Borderline Personality Disorder, Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lysaker_2017_contrasting.pdf
Size:
694.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: