Validation of two multiplex platforms to quantify circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial injury in severe infection

dc.contributor.authorLeligdowicz, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorConroy, Andrea L.
dc.contributor.authorHawkes, Michael
dc.contributor.authorZhong, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorLebovic, Gerald
dc.contributor.authorMatthay, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorKain, Kevin C.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-14T14:01:15Z
dc.date.available2018-03-14T14:01:15Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-18
dc.description.abstractBiomarkers can prognosticate outcome and enable risk-stratification. In severe infection, focusing on multiple markers reflecting pathophysiological mechanisms of organ injury could enhance management and pathway-directed therapeutics. Limited data exist on the performance of multiplex biomarker platforms. Our goal was to compare endothelial and immune activation biomarkers in severe pediatric infections using two multiplex platforms. Frozen plasma from 410 children presenting to the Jinja Regional Hospital in Uganda with suspected infection was used to measure biomarkers of endothelial (Angiopoietin-2, sFlt-1, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1) and immune (IL-6, IP-10, sTNFR-1, CHI3L1) activation. Two multiplex platforms (Luminex®, EllaTM) based on monoclonal antibody sandwich immunoassays using biotin-streptavidin conjugate chemistry were selected with reagents from R&D Systems. The two platforms differed in ease and time of completion, number of samples per assay, and dynamic concentration range. Intra-assay variability assessed using a coefficient of variation (CV%) was 2.2-3.4 for Luminex® and 1.2-2.9 for EllaTM. Correlations for biomarker concentrations within dynamic range of both platforms were best for IL-6 (ρ = 0.96, p<0.0001), IP-10 (ρ = 0.94, p<0.0001) and sFlt-1 (ρ = 0.94, p<0.0001). Agreement between concentrations obtained by both methods assessed by the Bland-Altman test varied, with best agreement for CHI3L1. Our data suggest that biomarkers of endothelial and immune activation can be readily measured with multiplex platforms. Luminex® and EllaTM produced reliable results with excellent CV% values. The EllaTM platform was more automated and completed in 75 minutes, potentially compatible with near-patient use. Trends in concentrations obtained by these methods were highly correlated, although absolute values varied, suggesting caution is required when comparing data from different multiplex platforms.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLeligdowicz, A., Conroy, A. L., Hawkes, M., Zhong, K., Lebovic, G., Matthay, M. A., & Kain, K. C. (2017). Validation of two multiplex platforms to quantify circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial injury in severe infection. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0175130. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175130en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/15502
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1371/journal.pone.0175130en_US
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONEen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectAngiopoietin-2en_US
dc.subjectBlooden_US
dc.subjectEndothelium -- Vascularen_US
dc.subjectInfectionen_US
dc.subjectInflammationen_US
dc.subjectVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1en_US
dc.subjectVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1en_US
dc.titleValidation of two multiplex platforms to quantify circulating markers of inflammation and endothelial injury in severe infectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pone.0175130.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Research Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: