Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse

dc.contributor.authorSorensen, Mathew D.
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Jonathan D.
dc.contributor.authorBorofsky, Michael S.
dc.contributor.authorHameed, Tariq A.
dc.contributor.authorSmoot, Kimberly J.
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Barbara H.
dc.contributor.authorLevchak, Branda J.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, James C., Jr.
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ziyue
dc.contributor.authorLingeman, James E.
dc.contributor.departmentRadiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-26T13:07:59Z
dc.date.available2023-10-26T13:07:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: The benefits of removing small (≤6 mm), asymptomatic kidney stones endoscopically is unknown. Current guidelines leave such decisions to the urologist and the patient. A prospective study involving older, nonendoscopic technology and some retrospective studies favor observation. However, published data indicate that about half of small renal stones left in place at the time that larger stones were removed caused other symptomatic events within 5 years after surgery. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which, during the endoscopic removal of ureteral or contralateral kidney stones, remaining small, asymptomatic stones were removed in 38 patients (treatment group) and were not removed in 35 patients (control group). The primary outcome was relapse as measured by future emergency department visits, surgeries, or growth of secondary stones. Results: After a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the treatment group had a longer time to relapse than the control group (P<0.001 by log-rank test). The restricted mean (±SE) time to relapse was 75% longer in the treatment group than in the control group (1631.6±72.8 days vs. 934.2±121.8 days). The risk of relapse was 82% lower in the treatment group than the control group (hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.44), with 16% of patients in the treatment group having a relapse as compared with 63% of those in the control group. Treatment added a median of 25.6 minutes (interquartile range, 18.5 to 35.2) to the surgery time. Five patients in the treatment group and four in the control group had emergency department visits within 2 weeks after surgery. Eight patients in the treatment group and 10 in the control group reported passing kidney stones. Conclusions: The removal of small, asymptomatic kidney stones during surgery to remove ureteral or contralateral kidney stones resulted in a lower incidence of relapse than nonremoval and in a similar number of emergency department visits related to the surgery.
dc.description.sponsorshipFunded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02210650
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationSorensen MD, Harper JD, Borofsky MS, et al. Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):506-513. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2204253
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/36692
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society
dc.relation.isversionof10.1056/NEJMoa2204253
dc.relation.journalThe New England Journal of Medicine
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectChronic disease
dc.subjectEndoscopy
dc.subjectKidney calculi
dc.subjectSecondary prevention
dc.subjectUreteral calculi
dc.subjectUreteroscopy
dc.titleRemoval of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1853249.pdf
Size:
621.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: