Managing contested greenspace: neighborhood commons and the rise of dog parks
dc.contributor.author | Matisoff, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Noonan, Douglas S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-01T15:16:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-01T15:16:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | Dog parks present an emerging class or urban environmental amenities. In order to develop a better understanding of dog parks, this article applies existing literature regarding urban parks and common pool resource (CPR) management to off-leash recreation areas. We develop a typology dog-park management and build upon a survey of 298 dog park users of a major dog park. We test the relationship between the perception of the park as a successfully governed CPR, and behaviour which contributes to collective action, such as contributing time, money, or to the upkeep of the park and developing a sense of community. We see strong relationships between these indicators of overcoming collective action problems and the four variables corresponding to design principles. Across all models, feeling involved in rule-making positively and significantly predicts more collective action or stronger sense of community. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Matisoff, D., & Noonan, D. (2012). Managing contested greenspace: neighborhood commons and the rise of dog parks. International Journal of the Commons, 6(1), 28-51. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/3577 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Common Pool Resources | en_US |
dc.subject | dog parks | en_US |
dc.subject | green space | en_US |
dc.subject | urban parks | en_US |
dc.title | Managing contested greenspace: neighborhood commons and the rise of dog parks | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |