An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction-A Case Series
dc.contributor.author | Downs, Ronald K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hedges, Kellee | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Surgery, IU School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-05T18:31:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-05T18:31:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-07-22 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The practice of breast reconstruction continues to evolve with the introduction of new technologies. The authors describe a unique approach allowing immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction that can be performed on an outpatient basis. METHODS: After a nipple-sparing mastectomy, acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-covered implants are placed in a prepectoral position in an immediate reconstruction. Assessment of results was performed via a retrospective review of demographic and procedural data. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (79 breasts), mean age 46.8 years, were treated with direct-to-implant reconstruction using ADM-wrapped implants placed above the muscle with mean follow-up of 23.1 months (median 22 mo). Mean body mass index was 24.3, and 15 patients (33.3%) were current or former smokers. Twenty-seven patients (60%) had prior breast surgery with 22 (49%) exposed to chemotherapy and 34 (76%) radiation. Procedure time averaged 155 minutes and hospital length of stay averaged 0.6 days. Complications included flap necrosis in 22 cases (28%), seroma in 12 (15%), infection in 8 (10%), rippling in 28 (35%), and contracture in 8 (10%). In 14 breasts (18%), postoperative wound complications (flap necrosis or infection) led to implant loss. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of ADM and cohesive gel implants has allowed us to perform above-the-muscle implant breast reconstruction in reduced time and often on an outpatient basis. Complication rates were comparable to expected results of standard expander-to-implant, staged breast reconstruction. This technique is a viable option delivering clinically and aesthetically acceptable results in select patients. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Downs, R. K., & Hedges, K. (2016). An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 4(7), e821. http://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000839 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/12843 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000839 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | |
dc.source | PMC | en_US |
dc.subject | Breast reconstruction | en_US |
dc.subject | Mastectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-covered implants | en_US |
dc.subject | Breast implants | en_US |
dc.title | An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction-A Case Series | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |