Testing Measurement Invariance with Ordinal Missing Data: A Comparison of Estimators and Missing Data Techniques

Date
2020
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Taylor & Francis
Abstract

Ordinal missing data are common in measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) testing studies. However, there is a lack of guidance on the appropriate method to deal with ordinal missing data in ME/I testing. Five methods may be used to deal with ordinal missing data in ME/I testing, including the continuous full information maximum likelihood estimation method (FIML), continuous robust FIML (rFIML), FIML with probit links (pFIML), FIML with logit links (lFIML), and mean and variance adjusted weight least squared estimation method combined with pairwise deletion (WLSMV_PD). The current study evaluates the relative performance of these methods in producing valid chi-square difference tests (Δχ2) and accurate parameter estimates. The result suggests that all methods except for WLSMV_PD can reasonably control the type I error rates of Δχ2 tests and maintain sufficient power to detect noninvariance in most conditions. Only pFIML and lFIML yield accurate factor loading estimates and standard errors across all the conditions. Recommendations are provided to researchers based on the results.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Chen, P.-Y., Wu, W., Garnier-Villarreal, M., Kite, B. A., & Jia, F. (2020). Testing Measurement Invariance with Ordinal Missing Data: A Comparison of Estimators and Missing Data Techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1608799
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Rights
Publisher Policy
Source
Author
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}