An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine
dc.contributor.author | Golembiewski, Elizabeth H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mainous, Arch G., III | |
dc.contributor.author | Rahmanian, Kiarash P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brumback, Babette | |
dc.contributor.author | Rooks, Benjamin J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Krieger, Janice L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodman, Kenneth W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moseley, Ray E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Harle, Christopher A. | |
dc.contributor.department | Health Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-09T18:56:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-09T18:56:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Patients are frequently asked to share their personal health information. The objective of this study was to compare the effects on patient experiences of 3 electronic consent (e-consent) versions asking patients to share their health records for research. Methods: A multi-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2017 through November 2018. Adult patients (n = 734) were recruited from 4 family medicine clinics in Florida. Using a tablet computer, participants were randomized to (1) a standard e-consent (standard), (2) an e-consent containing standard information plus hyperlinks to additional interactive details (interactive), or (3) an e-consent containing standard information, interactive hyperlinks, and factual messages about data protections and researcher training (trust-enhanced). Satisfaction (1 to 5), subjective understanding (0 to 100), and other outcomes were measured immediately, at 1 week, and at 6 months. Results: A majority of participants (94%) consented to future uses of their health record information for research. No differences in study outcomes between versions were observed at immediate or 1-week follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, compared with the standard e-consent, participants who used the interactive e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.43; SE = 0.09; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 18.04; SE = 2.58; P <.001). At 6-month follow-up, compared with the interactive e-consent, participants who used the trust-enhanced e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.9; SE = 1.0; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 32.2; SE = 2.6, P <.001). Conclusions: Patients who used e-consents with interactive research details and trust-enhancing messages reported higher satisfaction and understanding at 6-month follow-up. Research institutions should consider developing and further validating e-consents that interactively deliver information beyond that required by federal regulations, including facts that may enhance patient trust in research. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Golembiewski EH, Mainous AG 3rd, Rahmanian KP, et al. An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2021;19(1):16-23. doi:10.1370/afm.2610 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/46953 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Annals of Family Medicine, Inc. | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1370/afm.2610 | |
dc.relation.journal | Annals of Family Medicine | |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Consumer health informatics | |
dc.subject | Electronic health records | |
dc.subject | Informed consent | |
dc.subject | Health communication | |
dc.subject | Trust | |
dc.title | An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine | |
dc.type | Article | |
ul.alternative.fulltext | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7800739/ |