An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine

dc.contributor.authorGolembiewski, Elizabeth H.
dc.contributor.authorMainous, Arch G., III
dc.contributor.authorRahmanian, Kiarash P.
dc.contributor.authorBrumback, Babette
dc.contributor.authorRooks, Benjamin J.
dc.contributor.authorKrieger, Janice L.
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Kenneth W.
dc.contributor.authorMoseley, Ray E.
dc.contributor.authorHarle, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policy and Management, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-09T18:56:09Z
dc.date.available2025-04-09T18:56:09Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Patients are frequently asked to share their personal health information. The objective of this study was to compare the effects on patient experiences of 3 electronic consent (e-consent) versions asking patients to share their health records for research. Methods: A multi-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2017 through November 2018. Adult patients (n = 734) were recruited from 4 family medicine clinics in Florida. Using a tablet computer, participants were randomized to (1) a standard e-consent (standard), (2) an e-consent containing standard information plus hyperlinks to additional interactive details (interactive), or (3) an e-consent containing standard information, interactive hyperlinks, and factual messages about data protections and researcher training (trust-enhanced). Satisfaction (1 to 5), subjective understanding (0 to 100), and other outcomes were measured immediately, at 1 week, and at 6 months. Results: A majority of participants (94%) consented to future uses of their health record information for research. No differences in study outcomes between versions were observed at immediate or 1-week follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, compared with the standard e-consent, participants who used the interactive e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.43; SE = 0.09; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 18.04; SE = 2.58; P <.001). At 6-month follow-up, compared with the interactive e-consent, participants who used the trust-enhanced e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.9; SE = 1.0; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 32.2; SE = 2.6, P <.001). Conclusions: Patients who used e-consents with interactive research details and trust-enhancing messages reported higher satisfaction and understanding at 6-month follow-up. Research institutions should consider developing and further validating e-consents that interactively deliver information beyond that required by federal regulations, including facts that may enhance patient trust in research.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationGolembiewski EH, Mainous AG 3rd, Rahmanian KP, et al. An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine. Ann Fam Med. 2021;19(1):16-23. doi:10.1370/afm.2610
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/46953
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAnnals of Family Medicine, Inc.
dc.relation.isversionof10.1370/afm.2610
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Family Medicine
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectConsumer health informatics
dc.subjectElectronic health records
dc.subjectInformed consent
dc.subjectHealth communication
dc.subjectTrust
dc.titleAn Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7800739/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Golembiewski2021Electronic-PP.pdf
Size:
766 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: