Measuring empathy in schizophrenia: The Empathic Accuracy Task and its correlation with other empathy measures

dc.contributor.authorvan Donkersgoed, R. J. M.
dc.contributor.authorde Jong, S.
dc.contributor.authoraan het Rot, M.
dc.contributor.authorWunderink, L.
dc.contributor.authorLysaker, P. H.
dc.contributor.authorHasson-Ohayon, I.
dc.contributor.authorAleman, A.
dc.contributor.authorPijnenborg, G. H. M.
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatry, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-24T18:54:42Z
dc.date.available2020-04-24T18:54:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Empathy is an interpersonal process impaired in schizophrenia. Past studies have mainly used questionnaires or performance-based tasks with static cues to measure cognitive and affective empathy. We used the Empathic Accuracy Task (EAT) designed to capture dynamic aspects of empathy by using videoclips in which perceivers continuously judge emotionally charged stories. We compared individuals with schizophrenia with a healthy comparison group and assessed correlations among EAT and three other commonly used empathy measures. Method Patients (n = 92) and a healthy comparison group (n = 42) matched for age, gender and education completed the EAT, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy and Faux Pas. Differences between groups were analyzed and correlations were calculated between empathy measurement instruments. Results The groups differed in EAT performance, with the comparison group outperforming patients. A moderating effect was found for emotional expressivity of the target: while both patients and the comparison group scored low when judging targets with low expressivity, the comparison group performed better than patients with more expressive targets. Though there were also group differences on the empathy questionnaires, EAT performance did not correlate with questionnaire scores. Conclusions Individuals with schizophrenia benefit less from the emotional expressivity of other people than the comparison group, which contributes to their impaired empathic accuracy. The lack of correlation between the EAT and the questionnaires suggests a distinction between self-report empathy and actual empathy performance. To explore empathic difficulties in real life, it is important to use instruments that take the interpersonal perspective into account.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationvan Donkersgoed, R. J. M., de Jong, S., aan het Rot, M., Wunderink, L., Lysaker, P. H., Hasson-Ohayon, I., Aleman, A., & Pijnenborg, G. H. M. (2019). Measuring empathy in schizophrenia: The Empathic Accuracy Task and its correlation with other empathy measures. Schizophrenia Research, 208, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.03.024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22637
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.schres.2019.03.024en_US
dc.relation.journalSchizophrenia Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectempathyen_US
dc.subjectaffectiveen_US
dc.subjectcognitiveen_US
dc.titleMeasuring empathy in schizophrenia: The Empathic Accuracy Task and its correlation with other empathy measuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
van Donkersgoed_2019_measuring.pdf
Size:
730.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: