Conventional Penile Reconstruction Versus Penile Allotransplantation: A Comprehensive Review

Date
2025-10-17
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Springer Nature
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Penile loss from trauma, oncologic resection, congenital anomalies, or gender-affirming needs represents a devastating condition with profound functional and psychosocial implications. Conventional reconstructive techniques, including radial forearm, fibula, scapular, and anterolateral thigh flaps, have evolved over decades and provide patients with an acceptable neophallus capable of voiding and sexual activity. However, these methods remain limited by donor-site morbidity, prosthesis-related complications, high revision rates, and the inability to restore natural erectile tissue or fully replicate penile appearance. In recent years, penile allotransplantation has emerged as an alternative within the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation, offering restoration of native anatomy and the potential to achieve sensation, erectile function, and even fertility. To date, only five penile transplantations have been reported worldwide, each demonstrating encouraging short-term outcomes but raising complex challenges. The primary concerns are the lifelong requirement for systemic immunosuppression, the unknown long-term consequences of rejection episodes, and significant ethical and psychosocial considerations, including donor allocation, patient selection, and recipient and partner acceptance. In this narrative review, we compared conventional reconstructive approaches with transplantation, drawing on published literature and clinical experience to highlight indications, surgical techniques, functional outcomes, and psychosocial dimensions. While reconstruction remains the standard of care and provides reliable outcomes compatible with normal life expectancy, transplantation holds promise as a quality-of-life-enhancing option for carefully selected patients. Ongoing clinical research, refinement of surgical and immunological strategies, and the development of robust preclinical models will be essential in defining the role of penile allotransplantation in the future.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Kodali NA, Janarthanan R, Dirican OF, et al. Conventional Penile Reconstruction Versus Penile Allotransplantation: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2025;17(10):e94801. Published 2025 Oct 17. doi:10.7759/cureus.94801
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Cureus
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}