Systematic Heuristic Evaluation of Computerized Consultation Order Templates: Clinicians’ and Human Factors Engineers’ Perspectives

dc.contributor.authorSavoy, April
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Himalaya
dc.contributor.authorFlanagan, Mindy E.
dc.contributor.authorWeiner, Michael
dc.contributor.authorRuss, Alissa L.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T17:30:50Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T17:30:50Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.description.abstractWe assessed the usability of consultation order templates and identified problems to prioritize in design efforts for improving referral communication. With a sample of 26 consultation order templates, three evaluators performed a usability heuristic evaluation. The evaluation used 14 domain-independent heuristics and the following three supplemental references: 1 new domain-specific heuristic, 6 usability goals, and coded clinicians’ statements regarding ease of use for 10 sampled templates. Evaluators found 201 violations, a mean of 7.7 violations per template. Minor violations outnumbered major violations almost twofold, 115 (57%) to 62 (31%). Approximately 68% of violations were linked to 5 heuristics: aesthetic and minimalist design (17%), error prevention (16%), consistency and standards (14%), recognition rather than recall (11%), and meet referrers’ information needs (10%). Severe violations were attributed mostly to meet referrers’ information needs and recognition rather than recall. Recorded violations yielded potential negative consequences for efficiency, effectiveness, safety, learnability, and utility. Evaluators and clinicians demonstrated 80% agreement in usability assessment. Based on frequency and severity of usability heuristic violations, the consultation order templates reviewed may impede clinical efficiency and risk patient safety. Results support the following design considerations: communicate consultants’ requirements, facilitate information seeking, and support communication. While the most frequent heuristic violations involved interaction design and presentation, the most severe violations lacked information desired by referring clinicians. Violations related to templates’ inability to support referring clinicians’ information needs had the greatest potential negative impact on efficiency and safety usability goals. Heuristics should be prioritized in future design efforts.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationSavoy, A., Patel, H., Flanagan, M. E., Weiner, M., & Russ, A. L. (2017). Systematic Heuristic Evaluation of Computerized Consultation Order Templates: Clinicians’ and Human Factors Engineers’ Perspectives. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(8), 129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0775-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/15735
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10916-017-0775-7en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Medical Systemsen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectreferral and consultationen_US
dc.subjectheuristicsen_US
dc.subjectelectronic health recordsen_US
dc.titleSystematic Heuristic Evaluation of Computerized Consultation Order Templates: Clinicians’ and Human Factors Engineers’ Perspectivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Savoy_2017_systematic.pdf
Size:
364.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: