Quality of Life Following Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node–Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2022-02-01
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
American Medical Association
Abstract

Importance: Breast cancer treatment can impact not only short-term health but may also affect longer-term quality of life (QOL).

Objective: To describe and evaluate factors associated with diminished QOL following completion of active treatment.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included patients with lymph node-positive or high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer who had undergone definitive surgery and were enrolled in ECOG-ACRIN E5103, a multisite phase 3 trial. A survey was administered 18 months after enrollment to patients enrolled between January and June 2010. Final analysis of the data took place from March to December 2021.

Interventions: Patients received adjuvant doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel with either bevacizumab or placebo.

Main outcomes and measures: QOL and health status assessed with the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L), EQ-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer, with arm subscale (FACT-B+4). Groups were compared by Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum, or Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess factors independently associated with FACT-B scores.

Results: Data at 18 months were available from 455 of 519 patients (87.7%) enrolled in the trial. Median (range) age at enrollment was 52 (25-76) years. No differences in QOL (median [range] FACT-B scores: group A, 123 [67-146]; group B, 114 [54-148]; group C, 117 [42-148]; P = .23) or health status (median [range] EQ-5D-3L index scores: group A, 0.83 [0.28-1.00]; group B, 0.83 [0.20-1.00]; group C, 0.83 [0.17-1.00], P = .80; median EQ-VAS: group A, 85 [20-100]; group B, 85 [0-100]; group C, 85 [0-100]; P = .79) were observed across treatment groups; results for subsequent analyses were therefore reported irrespective of primary treatment. Overall, half of patients (258 of 444 [58%]) reported at least some pain or discomfort; 170 (38%) reported symptoms of anxiety or depression. In multivariable analyses, mastectomy with radiation (vs breast conserving surgery) and Asian, Black, or American Indian or Alaska Native race (vs White race) were associated with lower QOL (mastectomy with radiation: coefficient: -5.5; 95% CI, -10.1 to -0.9; Asian, Black, or American Indian or Alaska Native race: coefficient: -7.3; 95% CI, -13.2, -1.4).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was not negatively associated with QOL at 18 months. A substantial proportion of participants reported problems related to pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression, demonstrating persistent consequences for physical and psychosocial well-being in this heavily treated population. Many problems reported are amenable to intervention, underscoring the need for timely referral to supportive resources, especially for women of color and those who have more extensive local therapy.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Rosenberg SM, O'Neill A, Sepucha K, et al. Quality of Life Following Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e220254. Published 2022 Feb 1. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0254
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
JAMA Network Open
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}