Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today’s practice

dc.contributor.authorGilligan, MaryAnn C.
dc.contributor.authorOsterberg, Lars G.
dc.contributor.authorRider, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.authorDerse, Arthur R.
dc.contributor.authorWeil, Amy B.
dc.contributor.authorLitzelman, Debra K.
dc.contributor.authorDunne, Dana W.
dc.contributor.authorHafler, Janet P.
dc.contributor.authorPlews-Ogan, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorFrankel, Richard M.
dc.contributor.authorBranch, William T., Jr.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-01T17:52:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-01T17:52:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjective To explore leadership perspectives on how to maintain high quality efficient care that is also person-centered and humanistic. Methods The authors interviewed and collected narrative transcripts from a convenience sample of 32 institutional healthcare leaders at seven U.S. medical schools. The institutional leaders were asked to identify factors that either promoted or inhibited humanistic practice. A subset of authors used the constant comparative method to perform qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts. They reached thematic saturation by consensus on the major themes and illustrative examples after six conference calls. Results Institutional healthcare leaders supported vision statements, policies, organized educational and faculty development programs, role modeling including their own, and recognition of informal acts of kindness to promote and maintain humanistic patient-care. These measures were described individually rather than as components of a coordinated plan. Few healthcare leaders mentioned plans for organizational or systems changes to promote humanistic clinician-patient relationships. Conclusions Institutional leaders assisted clinicians in dealing with stressful practices in beneficial ways but fell short of envisaging systems approaches that improve practice organization to encourage humanistic care.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationGilligan, M. C., Osterberg, L. G., Rider, E. A., Derse, A. R., Weil, A. B., Litzelman, D. K., … Branch, W. T. (2019). Views of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today’s practice. Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/20106
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.025en_US
dc.relation.journalPatient Education and Counselingen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjecthumanismen_US
dc.subjectorganizational cultureen_US
dc.subjectfaculty developmenten_US
dc.titleViews of institutional leaders on maintaining humanism in today’s practiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gilligan_2019_views.pdf
Size:
517.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: