Remineralisation of enamel erosive lesions by daily-use fluoride treatments: network meta-analysis of an in situ study set

dc.contributor.authorCreeth, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Gary
dc.contributor.authorFranks, Billy
dc.contributor.authorHara, Anderson
dc.contributor.authorZero, Domenick
dc.contributor.departmentBiomedical and Applied Sciences, School of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T16:39:45Z
dc.date.available2025-01-23T16:39:45Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-26
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Daily-use fluoride products are first-line protection against enamel wear from dietary-acid exposure (DAE). This study aimed to understand effects of fluoride concentration, fluoride salt, product form and ingredients in daily-use products on remineralisation and demineralisation, via network meta-analysis (NMA) of 14 studies using one well-established in-situ model. Remineralisation (surface-microhardness recovery, SHMR) after treatment, and protection against subsequent demineralisation (acid-resistance ratio, ARR) were measured. Materials and methods: Healthy participants, wearing intra-oral palatal appliances holding enamel specimens eroded with standardised DAE, used test products once. Enamel hardness was assessed (Knoop microhardness probe) pre-DAE; post-DAE; after 4 h intra-oral remineralisation; and after post-remineralisation DAE. NMA was performed using a mixed-models approach on subject-level data to estimate and compare means. Results: There was a dose-response for fluoride ion in toothpastes (0-1426ppm F; p < 0.001 for SMHR and ARR). One toothpaste (silica-based, 1150ppm F as NaF) showed a benefit for SMHR versus placebo [mean(standard error)]: 8.8%(0.6%) (33.0% vs. 24.2%; p < 0.001); for ARR: 0.27(0.03) (0.43 vs. 0.15; p < 0.001; 9 mutual studies). Use of fluoride mouthwash after fluoride toothpaste increased SMHR [2.4%(1.1%); p = 0.043; 3 studies]; the effect on ARR [0.08(0.05)] was not significant (p = 0.164). Negative effects of polyvalent metal ions and polyphosphates on SMHR (p < 0.05) were observed. Conclusions: NMA proved effective in discriminating between fluoride-based treatments in this in-situ study, highlighting the importance of fluoride ion to enamel protection and showing formulation ingredients can affect its performance. Clinical relevance: Daily-use fluoride products can protect enamel against dietary acids, but careful formulation is required for optimal performance.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationCreeth J, Smith G, Franks B, Hara A, Zero D. Remineralisation of enamel erosive lesions by daily-use fluoride treatments: network meta-analysis of an in situ study set. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;29(1):28. Published 2024 Dec 26. doi:10.1007/s00784-024-06107-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/45432
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00784-024-06107-1
dc.relation.journalClinical Oral Investigations
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectClinical study
dc.subjectDemineralisation
dc.subjectErosive toothwear
dc.subjectMouthwash
dc.subjectRemineralisation
dc.subjectToothpaste
dc.titleRemineralisation of enamel erosive lesions by daily-use fluoride treatments: network meta-analysis of an in situ study set
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Creeth2024Remineralisation-CCBY.pdf
Size:
2.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: