Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention in the intensive care unit
dc.contributor.author | Jawed, Yameena T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Golovyan, Dmitriy | |
dc.contributor.author | Lopez, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Khan, Sikandar H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Sophia | |
dc.contributor.author | Freund, Chauncey | |
dc.contributor.author | Imran, Sundus | |
dc.contributor.author | Bin Hameed, Usman | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Joseph P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kok, Lotte | |
dc.contributor.author | Khan, Babar A. | |
dc.contributor.department | Medicine, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-19T18:57:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-19T18:57:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Delirium prevention requires optimal management of pain and anxiety. Given the limitations of current pharmacologic interventions, evaluation of novel non-pharmacological interventions is required. Virtual reality (VR) stimulation may be a promising intervention because of its capability to reduce psychophysiological stress, pain, and anxiety and to restore cognitive and attentional capacities. Objective: To ascertain patients' and providers' perceptions of acceptability and safety of VR intervention in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We enrolled a cohort of 15 ICU patients and 21 health care providers to administer a 15-minute session showing a relaxing beach scene with VR headsets and nature sound effects. Participants were then asked to rate their experiences on a Likert scale survey. Results: The majority of patients (86%, 12 of 14) rated the headsets as moderately to very comfortable. All had moderate or greater sense of presence in the virtual environment, and 79% (11 of 14) rated their overall experience at 3 or greater (5 indicating that they enjoyed it very much). Seventy-one percent (10 of 14) of the patients felt that their anxiety was better with VR, and 57% (8 of 14) did not notice a change in their pain or discomfort. All health care providers found the headset to be at least moderately comfortable and felt a moderate or greater sense of presence. All providers concluded that VR therapy should be available for their patients. Both groups experienced minimal side effects. Conclusion: In this prospective study of perceptions of VR therapy for ICU patients and health care providers, there was a high level of acceptance, with minimal side effects, for both groups despite their low levels of prior experience with virtual reality and video gaming. | |
dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | |
dc.identifier.citation | Jawed YT, Golovyan D, Lopez D, et al. Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention in the intensive care unit. Heart Lung. 2021;50(6):748-753. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.05.007 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/35647 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.05.007 | |
dc.relation.journal | Heart & Lung | |
dc.rights | Publisher Policy | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Virtual reality | |
dc.subject | Intensive care unit | |
dc.subject | Delirium | |
dc.subject | Feasibility | |
dc.subject | Critical illness | |
dc.title | Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention in the intensive care unit | |
dc.type | Article |