Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care

dc.contributor.authorApathy, Nate C.
dc.contributor.authorSanner, Lindsey
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Meredith C.B.
dc.contributor.authorMamlin, Burke W.
dc.contributor.authorGrout, Randall W.
dc.contributor.authorFortin, Saura
dc.contributor.authorHillstrom, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSaha, Amit
dc.contributor.authorTeal, Evgenia
dc.contributor.authorVest, Joshua R.
dc.contributor.authorMenachemi, Nir
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Robert W.
dc.contributor.authorHarle, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.authorMazurenko, Olena
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policy and Management, School of Public Health
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-15T15:54:33Z
dc.date.available2023-08-15T15:54:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-15
dc.description.abstractObjective: Given time constraints, poorly organized information, and complex patients, primary care providers (PCPs) can benefit from clinical decision support (CDS) tools that aggregate and synthesize problem-specific patient information. First, this article describes the design and functionality of a CDS tool for chronic noncancer pain in primary care. Second, we report on the retrospective analysis of real-world usage of the tool in the context of a pragmatic trial. Materials and methods: The tool known as OneSheet was developed using user-centered principles and built in the Epic electronic health record (EHR) of 2 health systems. For each relevant patient, OneSheet presents pertinent information in a single EHR view to assist PCPs in completing guideline-recommended opioid risk mitigation tasks, review previous and current patient treatments, view patient-reported pain, physical function, and pain-related goals. Results: Overall, 69 PCPs accessed OneSheet 2411 times (since November 2020). PCP use of OneSheet varied significantly by provider and was highly skewed (site 1: median accesses per provider: 17 [interquartile range (IQR) 9-32]; site 2: median: 8 [IQR 5-16]). Seven "power users" accounted for 70% of the overall access instances across both sites. OneSheet has been accessed an average of 20 times weekly between the 2 sites. Discussion: Modest OneSheet use was observed relative to the number of eligible patients seen with chronic pain. Conclusions: Organizations implementing CDS tools are likely to see considerable provider-level variation in usage, suggesting that CDS tools may vary in their utility across PCPs, even for the same condition, because of differences in provider and care team workflows.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationApathy NC, Sanner L, Adams MCB, et al. Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care. JAMIA Open. 2022;5(3):ooac074. Published 2022 Sep 15. doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac074
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/34925
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac074
dc.relation.journalJAMIA Open
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectPrimary care
dc.subjectClinical decision support tool
dc.subjectChronic pain
dc.titleAssessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ooac074.pdf
Size:
778.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: