Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care
dc.contributor.author | Apathy, Nate C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanner, Lindsey | |
dc.contributor.author | Adams, Meredith C.B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mamlin, Burke W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Grout, Randall W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fortin, Saura | |
dc.contributor.author | Hillstrom, Jennifer | |
dc.contributor.author | Saha, Amit | |
dc.contributor.author | Teal, Evgenia | |
dc.contributor.author | Vest, Joshua R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Menachemi, Nir | |
dc.contributor.author | Hurley, Robert W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Harle, Christopher A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mazurenko, Olena | |
dc.contributor.department | Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T15:54:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-15T15:54:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09-15 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Given time constraints, poorly organized information, and complex patients, primary care providers (PCPs) can benefit from clinical decision support (CDS) tools that aggregate and synthesize problem-specific patient information. First, this article describes the design and functionality of a CDS tool for chronic noncancer pain in primary care. Second, we report on the retrospective analysis of real-world usage of the tool in the context of a pragmatic trial. Materials and methods: The tool known as OneSheet was developed using user-centered principles and built in the Epic electronic health record (EHR) of 2 health systems. For each relevant patient, OneSheet presents pertinent information in a single EHR view to assist PCPs in completing guideline-recommended opioid risk mitigation tasks, review previous and current patient treatments, view patient-reported pain, physical function, and pain-related goals. Results: Overall, 69 PCPs accessed OneSheet 2411 times (since November 2020). PCP use of OneSheet varied significantly by provider and was highly skewed (site 1: median accesses per provider: 17 [interquartile range (IQR) 9-32]; site 2: median: 8 [IQR 5-16]). Seven "power users" accounted for 70% of the overall access instances across both sites. OneSheet has been accessed an average of 20 times weekly between the 2 sites. Discussion: Modest OneSheet use was observed relative to the number of eligible patients seen with chronic pain. Conclusions: Organizations implementing CDS tools are likely to see considerable provider-level variation in usage, suggesting that CDS tools may vary in their utility across PCPs, even for the same condition, because of differences in provider and care team workflows. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Apathy NC, Sanner L, Adams MCB, et al. Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care. JAMIA Open. 2022;5(3):ooac074. Published 2022 Sep 15. doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac074 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/34925 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac074 | |
dc.relation.journal | JAMIA Open | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Primary care | |
dc.subject | Clinical decision support tool | |
dc.subject | Chronic pain | |
dc.title | Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care | |
dc.type | Article |