Biohacking Nerve Repair: Novel Biomaterials, Local Drug Delivery, Electrical Stimulation, and Allografts to Aid Surgical Repair

dc.contributor.authorCrabtree, Jordan R.
dc.contributor.authorMulenga, Chilando M.
dc.contributor.authorTran, Khoa
dc.contributor.authorFeinberg, Konstantin
dc.contributor.authorSanterre, J. Paul
dc.contributor.authorBorschel, Gregory H.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T08:09:37Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T08:09:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-31
dc.description.abstractThe regenerative capacity of the peripheral nervous system is limited, and peripheral nerve injuries often result in incomplete healing and poor outcomes even after repair. Transection injuries that induce a nerve gap necessitate microsurgical intervention; however, even the current gold standard of repair, autologous nerve graft, frequently results in poor functional recovery. Several interventions have been developed to augment the surgical repair of peripheral nerves, and the application of functional biomaterials, local delivery of bioactive substances, electrical stimulation, and allografts are among the most promising approaches to enhance innate healing across a nerve gap. Biocompatible polymers with optimized degradation rates, topographic features, and other functions provided by their composition have been incorporated into novel nerve conduits (NCs). Many of these allow for the delivery of drugs, neurotrophic factors, and whole cells locally to nerve repair sites, mitigating adverse effects that limit their systemic use. The electrical stimulation of repaired nerves in the perioperative period has shown benefits to healing and recovery in human trials, and novel biomaterials to enhance these effects show promise in preclinical models. The use of acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) circumvents the morbidity of donor nerve harvest necessitated by the use of autografts, and improvements in tissue-processing techniques may allow for more readily available and cost-effective options. Each of these interventions aid in neural regeneration after repair when applied independently, and their differing forms, benefits, and methods of application present ample opportunity for synergistic effects when applied in combination.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationCrabtree JR, Mulenga CM, Tran K, Feinberg K, Santerre JP, Borschel GH. Biohacking Nerve Repair: Novel Biomaterials, Local Drug Delivery, Electrical Stimulation, and Allografts to Aid Surgical Repair. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024;11(8):776. Published 2024 Jul 31. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11080776
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/43826
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/bioengineering11080776
dc.relation.journalBioengineering
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectNerve regeneration
dc.subjectPeripheral nerve injury
dc.subjectNerve conduit
dc.subjectElectrical stimulation
dc.subjectAutograft
dc.subjectAllograft
dc.titleBiohacking Nerve Repair: Novel Biomaterials, Local Drug Delivery, Electrical Stimulation, and Allografts to Aid Surgical Repair
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Crabtree2024Biohacking-CCBY.pdf
Size:
1.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: