Development and initial testing of the self‐care of chronic illness inventory

dc.contributor.authorRiegel, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorBarbaranelli, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorSethares, Kristen A.
dc.contributor.authorDaus, Marguerite
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Debra K.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorHaedtke, Christine A.
dc.contributor.authorFeinberg, Jodi L.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Solim
dc.contributor.authorStromberg, Anna
dc.contributor.authorJaarsma, Tiny
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-03T19:29:08Z
dc.date.available2020-04-03T19:29:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.description.abstractAim The aim was to develop and psychometrically test the self‐care of chronic illness Inventory, a generic measure of self‐care. Background Existing measures of self‐care are disease‐specific or behaviour‐specific; no generic measure of self‐care exists. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Methods We developed a 20‐item self‐report instrument based on the Middle Range Theory of Self‐Care of Chronic Illness, with three separate scales measuring Self‐Care Maintenance, Self‐Care Monitoring, and Self‐Care Management. Each of the three scales is scored separately and standardized 0–100 with higher scores indicating better self‐care. After demonstrating content validity, psychometric testing was conducted in a convenience sample of 407 adults (enrolled from inpatient and outpatient settings at five sites in the United States and ResearchMatch.org). Dimensionality testing with confirmatory factor analysis preceded reliability testing. Results The Self‐Care Maintenance scale (eight items, two dimensions: illness‐related and health‐promoting behaviour) fit well when tested with a two‐factor confirmatory model. The Self‐Care Monitoring scale (five items, single factor) fitted well. The Self‐Care Management scale (seven items, two factors: autonomous and consulting behaviour), when tested with a two‐factor confirmatory model, fitted adequately. A simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis on the combined set of items supported the more general model. Conclusion The self‐care of chronic illness inventory is adequate in reliability and validity. We suggest further testing in diverse populations of patients with chronic illnesses.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationRiegel, B., Barbaranelli, C., Sethares, K. A., Daus, M., Moser, D. K., Miller, J. L., … Jaarsma, T. (2018). Development and initial testing of the self-care of chronic illness inventory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(10), 2465–2476. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13775en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22476
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/jan.13775en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Advanced Nursingen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectchronic illnessen_US
dc.subjectself-careen_US
dc.subjectcomorbidityen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and initial testing of the self‐care of chronic illness inventoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Riegel_2019_development.pdf
Size:
659.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: