Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange

dc.contributor.authorApathy, Nate C.
dc.contributor.authorVest, Joshua R.
dc.contributor.authorAdler-Milstein, Julia
dc.contributor.authorBlackburn, Justin
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Brian E.
dc.contributor.authorHarle, Christopher A.
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policy and Management, School of Public Health
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T16:32:42Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T16:32:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the practice- and market-level factors associated with the amount of provider health information exchange (HIE) use. Materials and methods: Provider and practice-level data was drawn from the Meaningful Use Stage 2 Public Use Files from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Physician Compare National Downloadable File, and the Compendium of US Health Systems, among other sources. We analyzed the relationship between provider HIE use and practice and market factors using multivariable linear regression and compared primary care providers (PCPs) to non-PCPs. Provider volume of HIE use is measured as the percentage of referrals sent with electronic summaries of care (eSCR) reported by eligible providers attesting to the Meaningful Use electronic health record (EHR) incentive program in 2016. Results: Providers used HIE in 49% of referrals; PCPs used HIE in fewer referrals (43%) than non-PCPs (57%). Provider use of products from EHR vendors was negatively related to HIE use, while use of Athenahealth and Greenway Health products were positively related to HIE use. Providers treating, on average, older patients and greater proportions of patients with diabetes used HIE for more referrals. Health system membership, market concentration, and state HIE consent policy were unrelated to provider HIE use. Discussion: HIE use during referrals is low among office-based providers with the capability for exchange, especially PCPs. Practice-level factors were more commonly associated with greater levels of HIE use than market-level factors. Conclusion: This furthers the understanding that market forces, like competition, may be related to HIE adoption decisions but are less important for use once adoption has occurred.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationApathy NC, Vest JR, Adler-Milstein J, Blackburn J, Dixon BE, Harle CA. Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange [published correction appears in J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 May 05;:]. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(7):1451-1460. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/38662
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/jamia/ocab024
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectElectronic health records
dc.subjectHealth information exchange
dc.subjectHealth information interoperability
dc.subjectHealth information technology
dc.subjectMeaningful use
dc.subjectMedical informatics
dc.subjectPrimary care
dc.titlePractice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8279783/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Apathy2021Practice-PMClinkout.pdf
Size:
431.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: