Telemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers

dc.contributor.authorAl Ammary, Fawaz
dc.contributor.authorMotter, Jennifer D.
dc.contributor.authorSung, Hannah C.
dc.contributor.authorLentine, Krista L.
dc.contributor.authorSharfuddin, Asif
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Vineeta
dc.contributor.authorYadav, Anju
dc.contributor.authorDoshi, Mona D.
dc.contributor.authorVirmani, Sarthak
dc.contributor.authorConcepcion, Beatrice P.
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Terry
dc.contributor.authorSidoti, Carolyn N.
dc.contributor.authorJan, Muhammad Yahya
dc.contributor.authorMuzaale, Abimereki D.
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Joshua
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-16T07:45:24Z
dc.date.available2024-05-16T07:45:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractIndividuals considering living kidney donation face geographic, financial, and logistical challenges. Telemedicine can facilitate healthcare access/care coordination. Yet difficulties exist in telemedicine implementation and sustainability. We sought to examine centers' practices and providers' attitudes toward telemedicine to improve services for donors. We surveyed multidisciplinary providers from 194 active adult US living donor kidney transplant centers; 293 providers from 128 unique centers responded to the survey (center representation rate = 66.0%), reflecting 83.9% of practice by donor volume and 91.5% of US states/territories. Most centers (70.3%) plan to continue using telemedicine beyond the pandemic for donor evaluation/follow‐up. Video was mostly used by nephrologists, surgeons, and psychiatrists/psychologists. Telephone and video were mostly used by social workers, while video or telephone was equally used by coordinators. Half of respondent nephrologists and surgeons were willing to accept a remote completion of physical exam; 68.3% of respondent psychiatrists/psychologists and social workers were willing to accept a remote completion of mental status exam. Providers strongly agreed that telemedicine was convenient for donors and would improve the likelihood of completing donor evaluation. However, providers (65.5%) perceived out‐of‐state licensing as a key policy/regulatory barrier. These findings help inform practice and underscore the instigation of policies to remove barriers using telemedicine to increase living kidney donation.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationAl Ammary F, Motter JD, Sung HC, et al. Telemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers. Am J Transplant. 2022;22(8):2041-2051. doi:10.1111/ajt.17093
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/40788
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/ajt.17093
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectAccess to health care
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.subjectHealth services
dc.subjectKidney transplantation
dc.subjectLiving donors
dc.subjectTelehealth
dc.titleTelemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ammary2022Telemedicine-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
575.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: