Risks and Rewards of Advanced Practice Providers in Cardiothoracic Surgery Training: National Survey

dc.contributor.authorBlitzer, David
dc.contributor.authorStephens, Elizabeth H.
dc.contributor.authorTchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang
dc.contributor.authorLou, Xiaoying
dc.contributor.authorChen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorPattakos, Greg
dc.contributor.authorVardas, Panos N.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T20:14:29Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T20:14:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground Changes in healthcare have led to increasing utilization of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), but their role in Cardiothoracic Surgery (CTS) education remains undefined. This study aimed to analyze the extent of APP utilization on the CTS team, their role within the hierarchy of clinical care, and the impact of PEs on CTS training from the resident perspective. Methods CTS residents’ responses to the 2017 Thoracic Surgery Residents Association (TSRA)/Thoracic Surgery Directors Association (TSDA) In-Service Training Examination (ITE) survey regarding the role of APPs in specific clinical scenarios, and perception of APP contribution to residents’ educational environment were analyzed. Statistical analysis of categorical variables was performed in SPSS using a Fisher’s exact test and Pearson Chi-Square with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results Response rate was 82.1% (280/341). The median number of employed APPs was 16-20 and 50.4% (n=141) reported 11-25 PEs at their institution. The median forAPPs in the operating room, floor, and intensive care unit was 3, 3, and 2 respectively. Overall impression of APPs was positive in 87.5% (n=245) of respondents, with 47.7% (n=133) being “very positive” and 40.1% being “positive” (n=112). In general, residents reported greater resident involvement in post-operative issues and operative consults and greater APP involvement in floor issues. 72.5% of residents had not missed a surgical opportunity due to APPs while, 9.6% missed an opportunity due to a APP despite being at an appropriate level of training. Of those that reported missed opportunities, 44% were I-6 residents. There were no significant differences in APPs’ operative role based on resident seniority. Conclusions The overall impression of APPs among CTS residents is favorable, and they more commonly are involved assisting on the floor or the operating room. Occasionally, residents report missing a surgical opportunity due to APPs. There is further opportunity to optimize and standardize their role within programs, in order to improve clinical outcomes and enhance the CTS educational experience for residents.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationBlitzer, D., Stephens, E. H., Tchantchaleishvili, V., Lou, X., Chen, P., Pattakos, G., & Vardas, P. N. (2018). Risks and Rewards of Advanced Practice Providers in Cardiothoracic Surgery Training: National Survey. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.035en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/17751
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.035en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Annals of Thoracic Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectadvanced practice providersen_US
dc.subjectcardiothoracic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectresident trainingen_US
dc.titleRisks and Rewards of Advanced Practice Providers in Cardiothoracic Surgery Training: National Surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Blitzer_2018_risks.pdf
Size:
433.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: