A review of the literature and proposed algorithm for penile fracture management

dc.contributor.authorHardesty, Juliet
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Ramzy T.
dc.contributor.authorSoyster, Mary E.
dc.contributor.authorMellon, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorBernie, Helen L.
dc.contributor.departmentUrology, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-17T19:23:54Z
dc.date.available2024-12-17T19:23:54Z
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction In the management of penile fractures, immediate surgical repair has resulted in better outcomes when compared with a conservative approach; however, there is currently no consensus on the treatment of patients presenting beyond the immediate period (>24 hours) following injury. Objectives To examine the latest literature on management strategies in penile fracture and propose an optimal algorithm for the treatment of patients with delayed presentation. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted following the PRISMA-P 2020 guidelines. A search was performed in several databases with the following strategy: (“Penile fracture” OR “fracture of penis” OR “rupture of corpora cavernosa” OR “rupture of tunica albuginea”) AND (management OR treatment OR surgery OR “surgical reconstruction” OR “surgical repair”). This resulted in 108 relevant articles. Two independent reviewers screened these articles according to the inclusion criteria. Full-text review of 56 articles was performed, and ultimately 20 studies were selected. Measures included the use of diagnostic imaging, timing of surgical repair (immediate, <24 hours after injury; delayed, >24 hours), surgical approach, and long-term complications (ie, erectile dysfunction and penile curvature). Results The review highlighted the benefits of immediate surgical repair in penile fractures, demonstrating improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, it found that surgical repair should be considered even in cases with delayed presentation (>24 hours after injury). To better evaluate the long-term impact of delayed surgical intervention on patient outcomes, we recommend standardized postoperative follow-up, with routine assessments of erectile function and penile curvature. Conclusion Contemporary literature suggests that immediate and delayed surgical repair of penile fractures leads to adequate postoperative outcomes, and patients presenting >24 hours after injury should still be considered for surgery.
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscript
dc.identifier.citationHardesty, J., Burns, R. T., Soyster, M. E., Mellon, M., & Bernie, H. L. (2024). A review of the literature and proposed algorithm for penile fracture management. Sexual Medicine Reviews, 12(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead041
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/45113
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/sxmrev/qead041
dc.relation.journalSexual Medicine Reviews
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourceAuthor
dc.subjectpenile fracture
dc.subjectpenile trauma
dc.subjectpenile imaging
dc.titleA review of the literature and proposed algorithm for penile fracture management
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hardesty2023Systematic-AAM.pdf
Size:
439.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: