Symptom Treatment Preferences of Cancer Survivors: Does Fatigue Level Make a Difference?

dc.contributor.authorKrueger, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorSecinti, Ekin
dc.contributor.authorMosher, Catherine E.
dc.contributor.authorStutz, Patrick V.
dc.contributor.authorCohee, Andrea A.
dc.contributor.authorJohns, Shelley A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-06T20:53:18Z
dc.date.available2021-10-06T20:53:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is among the most prevalent symptoms in cancer survivors and often co-occurs with other symptoms. However, little is known about survivors' preferences for treating CRF and associated symptoms. Objective The aim of this study was to examine cancer survivors' interest in learning skills to manage CRF and associated symptoms and their interest in various nonpharmacologic interventions and modalities. These outcomes were compared between survivors with high and normal fatigue. Methods Breast, gastrointestinal, lung, and prostate cancer survivors (N = 338) completed a 1-time survey, including a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System fatigue measure and a checklist assessing interest in learning skills to manage CRF and associated symptoms as well as interest in nonpharmacologic interventions and modalities. Results Many cancer survivors reported interest in learning skills to manage CRF (range, 35%-78%) and associated symptoms (range, 13%-48%). Compared with survivors with normal fatigue (n = 180), highly fatigued survivors (n = 158; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System fatigue T score ≥ 55) were more likely to report interest in learning skills to manage various symptoms, self-compassion training, and programs offered individually and in person. Interest in other interventions and modalities did not vary by fatigue level. Conclusions Many cancer survivors, especially those with high fatigue, report interest in learning symptom management skills. Given survivors' high level of interest in complementary and integrative health interventions, future research should continue to assess their impact on symptoms and functioning.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKrueger, E., Secinti, E., Mosher, C. E., Stutz, P. V., Cohee, A. A., & Johns, S. A. (2021). Symptom Treatment Preferences of Cancer Survivors: Does Fatigue Level Make a Difference?. Cancer Nursing.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/26706
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLWWen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/NCC.0000000000000941en_US
dc.subjectCancer survivorsen_US
dc.subjectTreatmenten_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.titleSymptom Treatment Preferences of Cancer Survivors: Does Fatigue Level Make a Difference?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Krueger2021Symptom-AAM.pdf
Size:
250.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: