Antiremodeling Agents Influence Osteoblast Activity Differently in Modeling and Remodeling Sites of Canine Rib

dc.contributor.authorAllen, Matthew R.
dc.contributor.authorFollet, Helene
dc.contributor.authorKhurana, M.
dc.contributor.authorSato, M.
dc.contributor.authorBurr, David B.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Anatomy & Cell Biology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-22T22:18:19Z
dc.date.available2015-12-22T22:18:19Z
dc.date.issued2006-10-10
dc.description.abstractAntiremodeling agents reduce bone loss in part through direct actions on osteoclasts. Their effects on osteoblasts and bone formation activity are less clear and may differ at sites undergoing modeling vs. remodeling. Skeletally mature intact beagles, 1–2 years old at the start of the study, were treated daily with clinically relevant doses of alendronate (0.10 or 0.20 mg/kg), risedronate (0.05 or 0.10 mg/kg), raloxifene (0.50 mg/kg), or vehicle (1 mL/kg). Dynamic bone formation parameters were histologically assessed on periosteal, endocortical/trabecular, and intracortical bone envelopes of the rib. Raloxifene significantly increased periosteal surface mineral apposition rate (MAR), a measure of osteoblast activity, compared to all other treatments (+108 to +175%, P < 0.02), while having no significant effect on MAR at either the endocortical/trabecular or intracortical envelope. Alendronate (both 0.10 and 0.20 doses) and risedronate (only the 0.10 dose) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) suppressed MAR on the endocortical/trabecular envelope, while none of the bisphosphonate doses significantly altered MAR at either the periosteal or intracortical envelopes compared to vehicle. Based on these results, we conclude that (1) at clinically relevant doses the two classes of antiremodeling agents, bisphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor modulators, exert differential effects on osteoblast activity in the canine rib and (2) this effect depends on whether modeling or remodeling is the predominant mechanism of bone formation.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationAllen, M. R., Follet, H., Khurana, M., Sato, M., & Burr, D. B. (2006). Antiremodeling Agents Influence Osteoblast Activity Differently in Modeling and Remodeling Sites of Canine Rib. Calcified Tissue International, 79(4), 255–261. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-006-0031-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/7810
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCalcified Tissue Internationalen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00223-006-0031-5en_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectAlendronateen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, generalen_US
dc.subjectBisphosphonateen_US
dc.subjectcell biologyen_US
dc.subjectEndocrinologyen_US
dc.subjectOrthopedicsen_US
dc.subjectPeriostealen_US
dc.subjectRaloxifeneen_US
dc.subjectRisedronateen_US
dc.titleAntiremodeling Agents Influence Osteoblast Activity Differently in Modeling and Remodeling Sites of Canine Riben_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
allen-2006-antiremodeling.pdf
Size:
492.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: