Assessing public behavioral health services data: a mixed method analysis

dc.contributor.authorVaughn, Sierra X.
dc.contributor.authorMaxey, Hannah L.
dc.contributor.authorKeen, Alyson
dc.contributor.authorThoele, Kelli
dc.contributor.authorNewhouse, Robin
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-10T19:03:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-10T19:03:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-11
dc.description.abstractBackground Measuring behavioral health treatment accessibility requires timely, comprehensive and accurate data collection. Existing public sources of data have inconsistent metrics, delayed times to publication and do not measure all factors related to accessibility. This study seeks to capture this additional information and determine its importance for informing accessibility and care coordination. Methods The 2018 National Survey for Substance Abuse and Treatment Services (N-SSATS) data were used to identify behavioral health facilities in Indiana and gather baseline information. A telephone survey was administered to facilities with questions parallel to the N-SSATS and additional questions regarding capacity and patient intake. Quantitative analysis includes chi-square tests. A standard qualitative analysis was used for theming answers to open-ended questions. Results About 20% of behavioral health facilities responded to the study survey, and non-response bias was identified by geographic region. Among respondents, statistically significant differences were found in several questions asked in both the study survey and N-SSATS. Data gathered from the additional questions revealed many facilities to have wait times to intake longer than 2 weeks, inconsistency in intake assessment tools used, limited capacity for walk-ins and numerous requirements for engaging in treatment. Conclusion Despite the low response rate to this study survey, results demonstrate that multiple factors not currently captured in public data sources can influence coordination of care. The questions included in this study survey could serve as a framework for routinely gathering these data and can facilitate efforts for successful coordination of care and clinical decision-making.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationVaughn, S. X., Maxey, H. L., Keen, A., Thoele, K., & Newhouse, R. (2020). Assessing public behavioral health services data: A mixed method analysis. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 15, 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-020-00328-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-597Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/26962
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s13011-020-00328-9en_US
dc.relation.journalSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectBehavioral health treatmenten_US
dc.subjectaccessibilityen_US
dc.subjectcare coordinationen_US
dc.titleAssessing public behavioral health services data: a mixed method analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13011_2020_Article_328.pdf
Size:
1022.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: