Bridging the gap for future clinician‐educators

dc.contributor.authorDilly, Christen K.
dc.contributor.authorCarlos, W. Graham
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann-Longtin, Krista
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, John
dc.contributor.authorBurgner, Anna
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T16:13:11Z
dc.date.available2019-01-17T16:13:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.description.abstractBackground In contrast to the training required in the UK, opportunities for medical education training in the USA are limited. Resident‐as‐teacher programmes are typically insufficient to prepare trainees to be successful clinician‐educators, but few pursue formal education degrees. We sought to assess the need for, and feasibility of, a training pathway for subspecialty fellows in a large Department of Medicine that would prepare our trainees to become effective educators. Methods Quantitative and qualitative methods were used. Previous fellowship applicants and current programme directors were surveyed to determine the potential benefits of the programme. A pilot programme was conducted with fellows interested in education to determine the feasibility of the programme. Pilot participants were interviewed regarding the benefits that they gained from the pilot and the logistical challenges that they experienced. In contrast to the training required in the UK, opportunities for medical education training in the USA are limited Results Five highly ranked fellows would have scored our programmes higher if we offered this training pathway. Pilot participants and fellowship programme directors agreed that there is a compelling need for such a training pathway. A number of themes arose from the interviews that enabled us to build the framework for a strong programme. Discussion Our findings suggest that a clinician‐educator training pathway that draws from multiple subspecialties has the potential to improve recruitment, provide needed career counselling and skills development to trainees, and to build a community of educators that will benefit the institution. Important insights from pilot participant interviews will inform the programme design, in order to keep trainees engaged and overcome logistical challenges.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationDilly, C. K., Carlos, W. G., Hoffmann‐Longtin, K., Buckley, J., & Burgner, A. (2018). Bridging the gap for future clinician-educators. The Clinical Teacher, 15(6), 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/18183
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/tct.12737en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Clinical Teacheren_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectclinician-educatorsen_US
dc.subjectmedical education trainingen_US
dc.subjectsubspecialty fellowsen_US
dc.titleBridging the gap for future clinician‐educatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dilly_2018_bridging.pdf
Size:
291.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: