Assessment and Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric Pain: The Influence of Patient Race, Patient Gender, and Provider Pain-Related Attitudes

dc.contributor.authorMiller, Megan M.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Amy E.
dc.contributor.authorZapolski, Tamika C. B.
dc.contributor.authorRand, Kevin L.
dc.contributor.authorHirsh, Adam T.
dc.contributor.departmentPsychology, School of Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-10T19:44:29Z
dc.date.available2019-10-10T19:44:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have documented that racial minorities and women receive poorer pain care than their demographic counterparts. Providers contribute to these disparities when their pain-related decision-making systematically varies across patient groups. Less is known about racial and gender disparities in children with pain or the extent to which providers contribute to these disparities. In a sample of 129 medical students (henceforth referred to as "providers"), Virtual Human methodology and a pain-related version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) were used to examine the effects of patient race/gender on providers’ pain assessment/treatment decisions for pediatric chronic abdominal pain, as well as the moderating role of provider implicit pain-related race/gender attitudes. Findings indicated that providers rated Black patients as more distressed (mean difference [MD] = 2.33, P < .01, standard error [SE] = .71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .92, 3.73) and as experiencing more pain-related interference (MD = 3.14, P < .01, SE = .76, 95% CI = 1.63, 4.64) compared to White patients. Providers were more likely to recommend opioids for Black patients than White patients (MD = 2.41, P < .01, SE = .58, 95% CI = 1.05, 3.76). Female patients were perceived to be more distressed by their pain (MD = 2.14, P < .01, SE = .79, 95% CI = .58, 3.70) than male patients, however there were no gender differences in treatment recommendations. IAT results indicated that providers held implicit attitudes that Black Americans (M = .19, standard deviation [SD] = .29) and males (M = .38, SD = .29) were more pain-tolerant than their demographic counterparts; however, these implicit attitudes did not significantly moderate their pain assessment/treatment decisions. Future studies are needed to elucidate specific paths through which the pain experience and care of children differ across racial and gender groups.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationMiller, M. M., Williams, A. E., Zapolski, T. C. B., Rand, K. L., & Hirsh, A. T. (2019). Assessment and treatment recommendations for pediatric pain: The influence of patient race, patient gender, and provider pain-related attitudes. The Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.07.002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/21102
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jpain.2019.07.002en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Painen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePublisheren_US
dc.subjectraceen_US
dc.subjectgenderen_US
dc.subjectdisparitiesen_US
dc.titleAssessment and Treatment Recommendations for Pediatric Pain: The Influence of Patient Race, Patient Gender, and Provider Pain-Related Attitudesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Miller_2019_assessment.pdf
Size:
880.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: