A prospective analysis describing the innovative use of liposomal bupivacaine in burn patients

dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Allison N.
dc.contributor.authorBlair, Mary E.
dc.contributor.authorDegenkolb, Kerri E.
dc.contributor.authorFoster, David R.
dc.contributor.authorHartman, Brett C.
dc.contributor.authorSood, Rajiv
dc.contributor.authorWalroth, Todd A.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-24T17:48:57Z
dc.date.available2020-07-24T17:48:57Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractBurn patients frequently require autograft harvesting to facilitate wound healing, often resulting in significant pain. Liposomal bupivacaine is indicated for administration into a surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy, safety, and duration of postoperative analgesia with liposomal bupivacaine for donor site pain in burn patients. This was an observational, case–control study including adult patients with <20% total body surface area (TBSA) burned who received liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management after autograft harvesting from lower extremity donor site(s). Patients from the case group were matched to historical control patients treated with traditional pain management. The primary outcome was the cumulative pain scores on postoperative day one measured by the area under the curve (AUC0–24). Secondary outcomes included AUC0–72, total milligram morphine equivalents (MME), length of stay, and adverse events. Data were collected in 36 patients who received liposomal bupivacaine, with 21 patients eligible for matching to historical controls. Patients included in the intervention and control groups were well-matched at baseline. Patients in the intervention group had a significantly lower median (IQR) AUC0–24 [578 (408,740) vs. 680 (544,803); p = 0.05] and shorter length of stay [4 days (1,9.5) vs. 6 days (318); p = 0.01]. No differences in adverse events related to the administration of liposomal bupivacaine or opioid-related adverse events were observed. Results indicate liposomal bupivacaine is safe and effective in burn patients. The results of this study add to the limited body of literature examining efficacy in this population.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationBoyd, A. N., Blair, M. E., Degenkolb, K. E., Foster, D. R., Hartman, B. C., Sood, R., & Walroth, T. A. (2020). A prospective analysis describing the innovative use of liposomal bupivacaine in burn patients. Burns, 46(2), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.031en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/23371
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.031en_US
dc.relation.journalBurnsen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectliposomal bupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectburnsen_US
dc.subjectautograften_US
dc.titleA prospective analysis describing the innovative use of liposomal bupivacaine in burn patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Boyd_2019_prospective.pdf
Size:
369.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: