Hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional wound care after dermatologic surgery
dc.contributor.author | Holmes, Samantha P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rivera, Sydney | |
dc.contributor.author | Hooper, Perry B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Slaven, James E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Que, Syril Keena T. | |
dc.contributor.department | Medicine, School of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-24T12:16:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-24T12:16:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-21 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Hydrocolloid dressings (HCD) are helpful in chronic wound care, but research is limited in acute postoperative wounds. HCD can potentially be incorporated into a simplified wound care regimen after excisional surgeries. Objective: To examine whether a one-time HCD application after dermatologic surgery results in greater patient satisfaction and improved postoperative outcomes compared with conventional daily dressings (CDD). Methods: We examined patients who underwent Mohs or standard surgical excision with linear closure followed by HCD. The patients additionally had a history of excisional surgery with CDD in the past 5 years. A modified version of the validated Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire was administered. Results: The survey response rate was 74.4% (64/86). Compared with CDD, HCD rated higher in comfort, convenience, scar appearance, and simplicity of wound care instructions (P < .0001). Nearly all patients (96.8%) preferred HCD over CDD. Limitations: Variability in time from prior dermatologic surgery may introduce recall bias. Prior surgeries involving CDD were sometimes performed by a different surgeon, which could introduce other confounding factors. Conclusions: A simplified wound care regimen involving HCD can potentially lead to increased comfort, convenience, simplicity, and a subjective improvement in scar appearance, though additional studies are needed. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Holmes SP, Rivera S, Hooper PB, Slaven JE, Que SKT. Hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional wound care after dermatologic surgery. JAAD Int. 2021;6:37-42. Published 2021 Dec 21. doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2021.11.002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/32553 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.jdin.2021.11.002 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | JAAD International | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | PMC | en_US |
dc.subject | DuoDERM | en_US |
dc.subject | Excision | en_US |
dc.subject | General dermatology | en_US |
dc.subject | Healing | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrocolloid dressing | en_US |
dc.subject | Mohs micrographic surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Postoperative | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Wound care | en_US |
dc.title | Hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional wound care after dermatologic surgery | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |