Hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional wound care after dermatologic surgery

dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Samantha P.
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Sydney
dc.contributor.authorHooper, Perry B.
dc.contributor.authorSlaven, James E.
dc.contributor.authorQue, Syril Keena T.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T12:16:58Z
dc.date.available2023-04-24T12:16:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-21
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hydrocolloid dressings (HCD) are helpful in chronic wound care, but research is limited in acute postoperative wounds. HCD can potentially be incorporated into a simplified wound care regimen after excisional surgeries. Objective: To examine whether a one-time HCD application after dermatologic surgery results in greater patient satisfaction and improved postoperative outcomes compared with conventional daily dressings (CDD). Methods: We examined patients who underwent Mohs or standard surgical excision with linear closure followed by HCD. The patients additionally had a history of excisional surgery with CDD in the past 5 years. A modified version of the validated Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire was administered. Results: The survey response rate was 74.4% (64/86). Compared with CDD, HCD rated higher in comfort, convenience, scar appearance, and simplicity of wound care instructions (P < .0001). Nearly all patients (96.8%) preferred HCD over CDD. Limitations: Variability in time from prior dermatologic surgery may introduce recall bias. Prior surgeries involving CDD were sometimes performed by a different surgeon, which could introduce other confounding factors. Conclusions: A simplified wound care regimen involving HCD can potentially lead to increased comfort, convenience, simplicity, and a subjective improvement in scar appearance, though additional studies are needed.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationHolmes SP, Rivera S, Hooper PB, Slaven JE, Que SKT. Hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional wound care after dermatologic surgery. JAAD Int. 2021;6:37-42. Published 2021 Dec 21. doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2021.11.002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32553
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jdin.2021.11.002en_US
dc.relation.journalJAAD Internationalen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectDuoDERMen_US
dc.subjectExcisionen_US
dc.subjectGeneral dermatologyen_US
dc.subjectHealingen_US
dc.subjectHydrocolloid dressingen_US
dc.subjectMohs micrographic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPostoperativeen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectWound careen_US
dc.titleHydrocolloid dressing versus conventional wound care after dermatologic surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
main.pdf
Size:
307.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: