“Populism” versus “Popular”: A Response to Ziarek’s “Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics?”
| dc.contributor.author | Demirel-Pegg, Tijen | |
| dc.contributor.department | Political Science, School of Liberal Arts | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-31T19:34:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-31T19:34:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article discusses two main issues Ziarek highlights regarding populist social movements. The first one is the exclusionary stance populist movements take when contending for power in a democratic society. The second one is the repressive response to contenders when populist movements are in power. The underlying characteristic in both issues is that populists movements assume an anti-pluralist stance against other contending alternatives. Therefore, the distinction between “popular” and “populist” is an important one. | en_US |
| dc.eprint.version | Author's manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Demirel-Pegg, T. (2019). “Populism” versus “Popular”: A Response to Ziarek’s “Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics?” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 102(23), 152–157. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/730497 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/23506 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Project Muse | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Soundings | en_US |
| dc.rights | Publisher Policy | en_US |
| dc.source | Author | en_US |
| dc.subject | populism | en_US |
| dc.subject | social movements | en_US |
| dc.subject | repression | en_US |
| dc.title | “Populism” versus “Popular”: A Response to Ziarek’s “Populism—A Crux or Crisis of Politics?” | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |