Management of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: when to intervene?

dc.contributor.authorManghelli, Joshua L.
dc.contributor.authorCeppa, DuyKhanh P.
dc.contributor.authorGreenberg, Jason W.
dc.contributor.authorBlitzer, David
dc.contributor.authorHicks, Adam
dc.contributor.authorRieger, Karen M.
dc.contributor.authorBirdas, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T13:16:26Z
dc.date.available2019-09-16T13:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Esophagectomy is the mainstay treatment for early stage and locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. Anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy are associated with numerous detrimental sequelae. The management of anastomotic leaks has evolved over time. The present study is a single-institution experience of esophageal leak management over an 11-year period, in order to identify when these can be managed nonoperatively. Methods: All patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction at our institution between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Preoperative patient characteristics and perioperative factors were reviewed. Failure of initial leak treatment was defined as need for escalation of therapy. Length of stay (LOS) and postoperative mortality were the primary outcomes. Follow-up was obtained through institutional medical records and the Social Security Death Index. Results: Sixty-one of 692 (8.8%) patients developed an anastomotic leak. Forty-six patients (75.4%) first underwent observation, which was successful in 35 patients. Predictors of successful observation included higher preoperative albumin (P=0.02), leak diagnosed by esophagram (P=0.004), and contained leaks (P=0.01). Successful observation was associated with shorter LOS (P=0.001). Predictors of mortality included lower preoperative serum albumin (P=0.01) and induction therapy (P=0.03). Thirty and 90-day mortality among patients who developed an anastomotic leak were 9.8% and 16.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Over half of anastomotic leaks were managed successfully with observation alone and did not require additional interventions. We have identified factors that may predict successful therapy with observation in these patients. Further research is warranted to determine more timely interventions for patients likely to fail conservative management.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationManghelli, J. L., Ceppa, D. P., Greenberg, J. W., Blitzer, D., Hicks, A., Rieger, K. M., & Birdas, T. J. (2019). Management of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: when to intervene?. Journal of thoracic disease, 11(1), 131–137. doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.12.13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/20930
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAME Publishing Companyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.21037/jtd.2018.12.13en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Thoracic Diseaseen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectEsophagectomyen_US
dc.subjectAnastomotic leaken_US
dc.subjectEsophageal canceren_US
dc.titleManagement of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: when to intervene?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6384377/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jtd-11-01-131.pdf
Size:
295.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: