The influence of resuscitation preferences on obstetrical management of periviable deliveries

dc.contributor.authorEdmonds, Brownsyne Tucker
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Fatima
dc.contributor.authorHendrix, Kristin S.
dc.contributor.authorPerkins, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorZimet, Gregory D.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-04T16:10:00Z
dc.date.available2016-03-04T16:10:00Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.description.abstractObjective Determine the relative influence of patient's resuscitation preferences on periviable delivery management. Methods Surveyed 295 obstetrician-gynecologists about managing periviable preterm premature rupture of membranes. Across 10 vignettes, we systematically varied gestational age; occupation; method of conception; and resuscitation preference. Physicians rated their likelihood (0-10) of proceeding with induction, steroids, and cesarean. Data were analyzed via conjoint analysis. Results 205 physician responses were included. Median ratings for management decisions were: induction 1.89; steroids 5.00; cesarean for labor 3.89; cesarean for distress 4.11. Gestational age had the greatest influence on physician ratings across all decisions (importance values ranging from 72.6-86.6), followed by patient's resuscitation preference (range= 9.3-21.4). Conclusion Gestational age is weighted more heavily than patients’ resuscitation preferences in obstetricians’ decision-making for periviable delivery management. Misalignment of antenatal management with parental resuscitation preferences may adversely affect periviable outcomes. Interventions are needed to facilitate more patient-centered decision-making in periviable care.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationEdmonds, B. T., McKenzie, F., Hendrix, K. S., Perkins, S. M., & Zimet, G. D. (2015). The influence of resuscitation preferences on obstetrical management of periviable deliveries. Journal of Perinatology : Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association, 35(3), 161–166. http://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.175en_US
dc.identifier.issn0743-8346en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/8698
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/jp.2014.175en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Associationen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectDecision Makingen_US
dc.subjectFetal Viabilityen_US
dc.subjectResuscitationen_US
dc.titleThe influence of resuscitation preferences on obstetrical management of periviable deliveriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-675804.pdf
Size:
310.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's manuscript
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: