Asking the Right Questions About Secondhand Smoke

dc.contributor.authorKlein, Jonathan D.
dc.contributor.authorChamberlin, Margaret E.
dc.contributor.authorKress, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.authorGeraci, Mark W.
dc.contributor.authorRosenblatt, Susan
dc.contributor.authorBoykan, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorJenssen, Brian
dc.contributor.authorRosenblatt, Stanley M.
dc.contributor.authorMilberger, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorAdams, William G.
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Adam O.
dc.contributor.authorRigotti, Nancy A.
dc.contributor.authorHovell, Melbourne F.
dc.contributor.authorHolm, Amanda L.
dc.contributor.authorVandivier, Richard W.
dc.contributor.authorCroxton, Thomas L.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Patricia L.
dc.contributor.authorBlissard, Lani
dc.contributor.authorJewell, Kate
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Leisa
dc.contributor.authorOstrow, John
dc.contributor.authorResnick, Elissa A.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T18:14:32Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T18:14:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Despite knowledge about major health effects of secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure, systematic incorporation of SHS screening and counseling in clinical settings has not occurred. Methods: A three-round modified Delphi Panel of tobacco control experts was convened to build consensus on the screening questions that should be asked and identify opportunities and barriers to SHS exposure screening and counseling. The panel considered four questions: (1) what questions should be asked about SHS exposure; (2) what are the top priorities to advance the goal of ensuring that these questions are asked; (3) what are the barriers to achieving these goals; and (4) how might these barriers be overcome. Each panel member submitted answers to the questions. Responses were summarized and successive rounds were reviewed by panel members for consolidation and prioritization. Results: Panelists agreed that both adults and children should be screened during clinical encounters by asking if they are exposed or have ever been exposed to smoke from any tobacco products in their usual environment. The panel found that consistent clinician training, quality measurement or other accountability, and policy and electronic health records interventions were needed to successfully implement consistent screening. Conclusions: The panel successfully generated screening questions and identified priorities to improve SHS exposure screening. Policy interventions and stakeholder engagement are needed to overcome barriers to implementing effective SHS screening. Implications: In a modified Delphi panel, tobacco control and clinical prevention experts agreed that all adults and children should be screened during clinical encounters by asking if they are exposed or have ever been exposed to smoke from tobacco products. Consistent training, accountability, and policy and electronic health records interventions are needed to implement consistent screening. Increasing SHS screening will have a significant impact on public health and costs.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationKlein JD, Chamberlin ME, Kress EA, et al. Asking the Right Questions About Secondhand Smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(1):57-62. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz125
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/39224
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.1093/ntr/ntz125
dc.relation.journalNicotine & Tobacco Research
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectCounseling
dc.subjectEnvironmental exposure
dc.subjectSmoke-free policy
dc.subjectTobacco smoke pollution
dc.titleAsking the Right Questions About Secondhand Smoke
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7974019/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ntz125.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: