Is Operative Diagnosis for Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Related to Patient Reported Outcomes?

dc.contributor.authorHolder, Erik
dc.contributor.authorCiesielski, Alex
dc.contributor.authorZiemba-Davis, Mary
dc.contributor.authorMeneghini, R. Michael
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T18:31:02Z
dc.date.available2021-07-20T18:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.description.abstractBackground and Hypothesis: Component loosening and instability are the leading causes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes after revision THA based on failure etiology. We hypothesized that outcomes would differ based on reason for revision. Project Methods: 187 consecutive revision THAs performed between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Prospectively collected preoperative and minimum one-year Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/HOOS Jr., UCLA Activity Level, WOMAC Index, and patient satisfaction were assessed based on failure etiology. Demographic variables and covariates were accounted for including sex, age, BMI, ASA classification, heart disease, lumbar spine pathology, narcotic use, fibromyalgia, depression, and autoimmune arthritis. Results: Latest UCLA activity level did not differ based on failure etiology (p=0.381). However, the degree of improvement in activity level was higher (p= 0.04) in patients revised for loosening, instability, and infection compared to ALTR and polyethylene wear. HOOS Jr (p=0.949) and WOMAC total (p=0.147) scores did not differ based on failure etiology at latest follow-up, although patients revised for loosening had greater WOMAC improvement compared to all other groups except polyethylene wear (p=0.016). Satisfaction did not vary based on failure etiology (p=0.365), and demographic and covariates were unrelated to outcomes (p³0.165). Conclusion and Potential Impact: We observed that patient-reported outcomes following revision THA vary based on revision reason and activity level improvement is mitigated patients revised for ALTR and poly wear. These findings may help surgeons and patients alike set expectations for recovery following revision THA.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by CTSI funding and by award number UL1TR002529 from the National Institutes of Health. The project described was supported by the Indiana University Health – Indiana School of Medicine Strategic Research Initiative.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/26273
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectrevisionen_US
dc.subjecttotal hip arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectpatient reported outcomesen_US
dc.subjectoperative diagnosisen_US
dc.titleIs Operative Diagnosis for Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Related to Patient Reported Outcomes?en_US
dc.typePosteren_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ERIK.pdf
Size:
2.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Presentation slides
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
mzd Holder IMPRS Poster 07-22-2018.pdf
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Poster
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: