Haemophilus ducreyi Cutaneous Ulcer Strains Diverged from Both Class I and Class II Genital Ulcer Strains: Implications for Epidemiological Studies

dc.contributor.authorGangaiah, Dharanesh
dc.contributor.authorSpinola, Stanley M.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, IU School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T18:36:29Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T18:36:29Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-27
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Haemophilus ducreyi has emerged as a major cause of cutaneous ulcers (CU) in yaws-endemic regions of the tropics in the South Pacific, South East Asia and Africa. H. ducreyi was once thought only to cause the genital ulcer (GU) disease chancroid; GU strains belong to 2 distinct classes, class I and class II. Using whole-genome sequencing of 4 CU strains from Samoa, 1 from Vanuatu and 1 from Papua New Guinea, we showed that CU strains diverged from the class I strain 35000HP and that one CU strain expressed β-lactamase. Recently, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention released the genomes of 11 additional CU strains from Vanuatu and Ghana; however, the evolutionary relationship of these CU strains to previously-characterized CU and GU strains is unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We performed phylogenetic analysis of 17 CU and 10 GU strains. Class I and class II GU strains formed two distinct clades. The class I strains formed two subclades, one containing 35000HP and HD183 and the other containing the remainder of the class I strains. Twelve of the CU strains formed a subclone under the class I 35000HP subclade, while 2 CU strains formed a subclone under the other class I subclade. Unexpectedly, 3 of the CU strains formed a subclone under the class II clade. Phylogenetic analysis of dsrA-hgbA-ncaA sequences yielded a tree similar to that of whole-genome phylogenetic tree. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: CU strains diverged from multiple lineages within both class I and class II GU strains. Multilocus sequence typing of dsrA-hgbA-ncaA could be reliably used for epidemiological investigation of CU and GU strains. As class II strains grow relatively poorly and are relatively more susceptible to vancomycin than class I strains, these findings have implications for methods to recover CU strains. Comparison of contemporary CU and GU isolates would help clarify the relationship between these entities.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGangaiah, D., & Spinola, S. M. (2016). Haemophilus ducreyi Cutaneous Ulcer Strains Diverged from Both Class I and Class II Genital Ulcer Strains: Implications for Epidemiological Studies. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(12), e0005259. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005259en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/12448
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPlosen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1371/journal.pntd.0005259en_US
dc.relation.journalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseasesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectHaemophilus ducreyien_US
dc.subjectCancerous ulcersen_US
dc.subjectSouth Pacificen_US
dc.subjectSouth East Asiaen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.titleHaemophilus ducreyi Cutaneous Ulcer Strains Diverged from Both Class I and Class II Genital Ulcer Strains: Implications for Epidemiological Studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pntd.0005259.pdf
Size:
627.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Research Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: