Electromagnetic Guided Percutaneous Renal Access Outcomes Among Surgeons and Trainees of Different Experience Levels: A Pilot Study

dc.contributor.authorBorofsky, Michael S.
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Marcelino E.
dc.contributor.authorDauw, Casey A.
dc.contributor.authorKrambeck, Amy E.
dc.contributor.authorLingeman, James E.
dc.contributor.departmentUrology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-23T20:17:35Z
dc.date.available2020-10-23T20:17:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine feasibility of an electromagnetic (EM) guidance system (Auris Health, Redwood City, CA) in obtaining percutaneous renal access among urologists and trainees of different experience levels. EM-guidance is appealing for access as it allows real time, 3-dimensional targeting without radiation. Few studies have explored this for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and none have assessed its potential to decrease the learning curve in obtaining access using traditional techniques. Methods Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval was obtained to compare EM-guided percutaneous access to fluoroscopic guided access in a porcine model. Voluntary participants included urology trainees and faculty. They were categorized as beginner (no prior primary percutaneous nephrolithotomyexperience), intermediate (10-100 prior) and advanced (>100). Each participant attempted an EM and fluoroscopic guided puncture. Primary outcome was successful puncture. Secondary outcomes included access time, fluoroscopy time, and number of attempts. Participants were limited to 3 attempts and 10 minutes total to obtain access using each technique. Results Fourteen participants (6 beginners, 4 intermediates, and 4 experts) attempted 28 punctures. Overall success using EM-guidance was 93% compared to 71% using fluoroscopy ( P = .33). EM punctures had shorter access times (85 vs 255 seconds, P <.01) required fewer attempts (1 vs 2, P = .04) and had decreased associated fluoroscopy times (1 vs 96 seconds, P <.01) excluding the initial retrograde pyelogram and guidance of the ureteroscope to the desired calyx. Beginners showed comparable success rates and outcomes relative to experts despite higher access times. Conclusion EM-guidance is a promising new technique to decrease the learning curve of percutaneous access with high success rates and minimal radiation.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationBorofsky, M. S., Rivera, M. E., Dauw, C. A., Krambeck, A. E., & Lingeman, J. E. (2020). Electromagnetic Guided Percutaneous Renal Access Outcomes Among Surgeons and Trainees of Different Experience Levels: A Pilot Study. Urology, 136, 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.060en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/24175
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.060en_US
dc.relation.journalUrologyen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectelectromagnetic guidance systemen_US
dc.subjectEM-guidanceen_US
dc.titleElectromagnetic Guided Percutaneous Renal Access Outcomes Among Surgeons and Trainees of Different Experience Levels: A Pilot Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Borofsky_2019_electromagnetic.pdf
Size:
679.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: