Improving Patient-Centered Communication about Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy through Computerized Clinical Decision Support

dc.contributor.authorGrout, Randall W.
dc.contributor.authorBuchhalter, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Anup D.
dc.contributor.authorBrin, Amy
dc.contributor.authorClark, Ann A.
dc.contributor.authorHolmay, Mary
dc.contributor.authorStory, Tyler J.
dc.contributor.authorDowns, Stephen M.
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T14:17:03Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T14:17:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a rare but fatal risk that patients, parents, and professional societies clearly recommend discussing with patients and families. However, this conversation does not routinely happen. Objectives: This pilot study aimed to demonstrate whether computerized decision support could increase patient communication about SUDEP. Methods: A prospective before-and-after study of the effect of computerized decision support on delivery of SUDEP counseling. The intervention was a screening, alerting, education, and follow-up SUDEP module for an existing computerized decision support system (the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation [CHICA]) in five urban pediatric primary care clinics. Families of children with epilepsy were contacted by telephone before and after implementation to assess if the clinician discussed SUDEP at their respective encounters. Results: The CHICA-SUDEP module screened 7,154 children age 0 to 21 years for seizures over 7 months; 108 (1.5%) reported epilepsy. We interviewed 101 families after primary care encounters (75 before and 26 after implementation) over 9 months. After starting CHICA-SUDEP, the number of caregivers who reported discussing SUDEP with their child's clinician more than doubled from 21% (16/75) to 46% (12/26; p = 0.03), and when the parent recalled who brought up the topic, 80% of the time it was the clinician. The differences between timing and sampling methodologies of before and after intervention cohorts could have led to potential sampling and recall bias. Conclusion: Clinician-family discussions about SUDEP significantly increased in pediatric primary care clinics after introducing a systematic, computerized screening and decision support module. These tools demonstrate potential for increasing patient-centered education about SUDEP, as well as incorporating other guideline-recommended algorithms into primary and subspecialty cares.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationGrout RW, Buchhalter J, Patel AD, et al. Improving Patient-Centered Communication about Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy through Computerized Clinical Decision Support. Appl Clin Inform. 2021;12(1):90-99. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1722221
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/39211
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThieme
dc.relation.isversionof10.1055/s-0040-1722221
dc.relation.journalApplied Clinical Informatics
dc.rightsPublisher Policy
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectClinical decision support systems
dc.subjectSudden unexpected death in epilepsy
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectPatient education
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.titleImproving Patient-Centered Communication about Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy through Computerized Clinical Decision Support
dc.typeArticle
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7889427/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
10-1055-s-0040-1722221.pdf
Size:
947.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: