Capabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States
dc.contributor.author | Devanathan, Nirupama | |
dc.contributor.author | Scheive, Melanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Nawash, Baraa S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Selvam, Amrish | |
dc.contributor.author | Murphy, Alec | |
dc.contributor.author | Morrow, McKenna | |
dc.contributor.author | Anant, Shruti | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Nickolas | |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Elizabeth A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kruger, Jessica S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yung, Chi-Wah Rudy | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Thomas V. | |
dc.contributor.department | Ophthalmology, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-28T10:54:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-28T10:54:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The Consortium of Student-Led Eye Clinics (CSLEC), founded in 2021, administered a comprehensive survey to document the types of services, most common diagnoses, and follow-up care protocols offered by student-led free vision screening programs (SLFVSP) in the United States. Methods: An 81-question institutional review board (IRB)-approved survey was administered to student-led vision screening eye clinics from October 1, 2022 to February 24, 2023. Results: Sixteen SLFVSPs were included in the final analysis, of which 81% (n = 13) conducted variations of fundoscopic examinations and 75% (n = 12) measured intraocular pressure. Cataracts and diabetic retinopathy were reported as the most frequent diagnoses by the majority of SLFVSPs (n = 9, 56%); non-mobile SLFVSPs more commonly reported cataract as a frequent diagnosis (P < 0.05). Most patients screened at participating programs were uninsured or met federal poverty guidelines. Prescription glasses were offered by 56% of the programs (n = 9). SLFVSPs that directly scheduled follow-up appointments reported higher attendance rates (66.5%) than those that only sent referrals (20%). Transportation was the most cited barrier for follow-up appointment attendance. Conclusions: SLFVSPs, one community vision screening initiative subtype, vary significantly in scope and capabilities of identifying vision threatening disease. The follow-up infrastructure is not uniformly robust and represents a key target for improving care delivery to at-risk populations. Translational relevance: The CSLEC aims to develop a consensus-based standardization for the scope of screening services, offer guidelines for diagnostic criteria, promote real-time data stewardship, and identify means to improve follow-up care mechanisms in member communities. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Devanathan N, Scheive M, Nawash BS, et al. Capabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024;13(1):9. doi:10.1167/tvst.13.1.9 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/41040 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1167/tvst.13.1.9 | |
dc.relation.journal | Translational Vision Science & Technology | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Vision screening | |
dc.subject | Health equity | |
dc.subject | Population health | |
dc.subject | Surveys and questionnaires | |
dc.title | Capabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States | |
dc.type | Article |