Capabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States

dc.contributor.authorDevanathan, Nirupama
dc.contributor.authorScheive, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorNawash, Baraa S.
dc.contributor.authorSelvam, Amrish
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Alec
dc.contributor.authorMorrow, McKenna
dc.contributor.authorAnant, Shruti
dc.contributor.authorChen, Nickolas
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Elizabeth A.
dc.contributor.authorKruger, Jessica S.
dc.contributor.authorYung, Chi-Wah Rudy
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Thomas V.
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmology, School of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T10:54:54Z
dc.date.available2024-05-28T10:54:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The Consortium of Student-Led Eye Clinics (CSLEC), founded in 2021, administered a comprehensive survey to document the types of services, most common diagnoses, and follow-up care protocols offered by student-led free vision screening programs (SLFVSP) in the United States. Methods: An 81-question institutional review board (IRB)-approved survey was administered to student-led vision screening eye clinics from October 1, 2022 to February 24, 2023. Results: Sixteen SLFVSPs were included in the final analysis, of which 81% (n = 13) conducted variations of fundoscopic examinations and 75% (n = 12) measured intraocular pressure. Cataracts and diabetic retinopathy were reported as the most frequent diagnoses by the majority of SLFVSPs (n = 9, 56%); non-mobile SLFVSPs more commonly reported cataract as a frequent diagnosis (P < 0.05). Most patients screened at participating programs were uninsured or met federal poverty guidelines. Prescription glasses were offered by 56% of the programs (n = 9). SLFVSPs that directly scheduled follow-up appointments reported higher attendance rates (66.5%) than those that only sent referrals (20%). Transportation was the most cited barrier for follow-up appointment attendance. Conclusions: SLFVSPs, one community vision screening initiative subtype, vary significantly in scope and capabilities of identifying vision threatening disease. The follow-up infrastructure is not uniformly robust and represents a key target for improving care delivery to at-risk populations. Translational relevance: The CSLEC aims to develop a consensus-based standardization for the scope of screening services, offer guidelines for diagnostic criteria, promote real-time data stewardship, and identify means to improve follow-up care mechanisms in member communities.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.identifier.citationDevanathan N, Scheive M, Nawash BS, et al. Capabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024;13(1):9. doi:10.1167/tvst.13.1.9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/41040
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
dc.relation.isversionof10.1167/tvst.13.1.9
dc.relation.journalTranslational Vision Science & Technology
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcePMC
dc.subjectVision screening
dc.subjectHealth equity
dc.subjectPopulation health
dc.subjectSurveys and questionnaires
dc.titleCapabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Devanathan2024Capabilities-CCBYNCND.pdf
Size:
537.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.04 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: