Incorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understanding

dc.contributor.authorKasperbauer, T. J.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Karen K.
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Ariane
dc.contributor.authorPerkins, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Peter H.
dc.contributor.departmentMedicine, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T20:53:53Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T20:53:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBiobank participants often do not understand much of the information they are provided as part of the informed consent process, despite numerous attempts at simplifying consent forms and improving their readability. We report the first assessment of biobank enrollees’ comprehension under an "integrated consent” process, where patients were asked to enroll in a research biobank as part of their normal healthcare experience. A number of healthcare systems have implemented similar integrated consent processes for biobanking, but it is unknown how much patients understand after enrolling under these conditions. Methods: We recruited patients who enrolled in a biobank while in a healthcare setting when receiving ordinary care. We assessed knowledge of consent materials using 11 true/false questions drawn from a well-known biobank knowledge test. After reviewing the results from 114 participants, we revised the consent form and repeated the knowledge assessment with 144 different participants. Results: Participants scored poorly on the knowledge test in both rounds, with no significant differences in overall scores or individual items between the rounds. In Phase 1, participants answered 53% of the questions correctly, 25% incorrectly, and 22% “I don’t know.” In Phase 2, participants answered 53% of questions correctly, 24% incorrectly, and 23% “I don’t know.” Participants scored particularly poorly on questions about data sharing and accessing medical records. Conclusions: Enrollees under an integrated consent model had significant misunderstandings that persisted despite an attempt to improve information specifically about those topics in a consent form. These results raise challenges for current approaches that attribute misunderstanding to overly complex consent forms. They also suggest that the pressures of the clinic may compound other problems with patient understanding of biobank consent. As health systems increasingly blend research and care, they may need to rethink their approach to educating patients about participation in a biobank.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationKasperbauer, T. J., Schmidt, K. K., Thomas, A., Perkins, S. M., & Schwartz, P. H. (2021). Incorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understanding. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 12(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2020.1851313en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/28387
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/23294515.2020.1851313en_US
dc.relation.journalAJOB Empirical Bioethicsen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourceAuthoren_US
dc.subjectbiobanksen_US
dc.subjectinformed consenten_US
dc.subjectuniversal consenten_US
dc.titleIncorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understandingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kasperbauer2021Incorporating.pdf
Size:
278.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: