Improving Notifiable Disease Case Reporting Through Electronic Information Exchange–Facilitated Decision Support: A Controlled Before-and-After Trial

dc.contributor.authorDixon, Brian E.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Zuoyi
dc.contributor.authorArno, Janet N.
dc.contributor.authorRevere, Debra
dc.contributor.authorGibson, P. Joseph
dc.contributor.authorGrannis, Shaun J.
dc.contributor.departmentEpidemiology, School of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-19T16:47:30Z
dc.date.available2022-10-19T16:47:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjective: Outbreak detection and disease control may be improved by simplified, semi-automated reporting of notifiable diseases to public health authorities. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of an electronic, prepopulated notifiable disease report form on case reporting rates by ambulatory care clinics to public health authorities. Methods: We conducted a 2-year (2012-2014) controlled before-and-after trial of a health information exchange (HIE) intervention in Indiana designed to prepopulate notifiable disease reporting forms to providers. We analyzed data collected from electronic prepopulated reports and "usual care" (paper, fax) reports submitted to a local health department for 7 conditions by using a difference-in-differences model. Primary outcomes were changes in reporting rates, completeness, and timeliness between intervention and control clinics. Results: Provider reporting rates for chlamydia and gonorrhea in intervention clinics increased significantly from 56.9% and 55.6%, respectively, during the baseline period (2012) to 66.4% and 58.3%, respectively, during the intervention period (2013-2014); they decreased from 28.8% and 27.5%, respectively, to 21.7% and 20.6%, respectively, in control clinics (P < .001). Completeness improved from baseline to intervention for 4 of 15 fields in reports from intervention clinics (P < .001), although mean completeness improved for 11 fields in both intervention and control clinics. Timeliness improved for both intervention and control clinics; however, reports from control clinics were timelier (mean, 7.9 days) than reports from intervention clinics (mean, 9.7 days). Conclusions: Electronic, prepopulated case reporting forms integrated into providers' workflow, enabled by an HIE network, can be effective in increasing notifiable disease reporting rates and completeness of information. However, it was difficult to assess the effect of using the forms for diseases with low prevalence (eg, salmonellosis, histoplasmosis).en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationDixon BE, Zhang Z, Arno JN, Revere D, Joseph Gibson P, Grannis SJ. Improving Notifiable Disease Case Reporting Through Electronic Information Exchange-Facilitated Decision Support: A Controlled Before-and-After Trial. Public Health Rep. 2020;135(3):401-410. doi:10.1177/0033354920914318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/30373
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0033354920914318en_US
dc.relation.journalPublic Health Reportsen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectHealth information exchangeen_US
dc.subjectInfectious disease reportingen_US
dc.subjectPublic health surveillanceen_US
dc.titleImproving Notifiable Disease Case Reporting Through Electronic Information Exchange–Facilitated Decision Support: A Controlled Before-and-After Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238703/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
10.1177_0033354920914318.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: