Care guided by tissue oxygenation and haemodynamic monitoring in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (Bottomline-CS): assessor blind, single centre, randomised controlled trial

Date
2025-03-24
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
BMJ
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Objective: To assess whether perioperative management guided by near-infrared spectroscopy to determine tissue oxygen saturation and haemodynamic monitoring reduces postoperative complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Design: Assessor blinded, single centre, randomised controlled trial (Bottomline-CS trial).

Setting: A tertiary teaching hospital in China.

Participants: 1960 patients aged 60 years or older who were scheduled for elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Interventions: All patients had multisite monitoring of tissue oxygen saturation (bilateral forehead and unilateral forearm brachioradialis) and haemodynamic monitoring. Both groups received usual care, including arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, electrocardiography, and transoesophageal echocardiography when indicated. Guided care aimed to maintain tissue oxygenation within 10% above or below preoperative baseline values, established 24-48 hours before surgery, from the start of anaesthesia until extubation or for up to 24 hours postoperatively. In the usual care group, tissue oximetry and haemodynamic data were concealed, and care was routine.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of a composite of 30 day postoperative complications, which were cerebral, cardiac, respiratory, renal, infectious, and mortality complications. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and hospital length of stay.

Results: Of 1960 patients randomly assigned, data from 967 guided care and 974 usual care patients were analysed. During anaesthesia, the area under the curve for tissue oxygen saturation measurements outside the plus and minus 10% baseline range was significantly smaller with guided care than only usual care: left forehead 32.4 versus 57.6 (%×min, P<0.001), right forehead 37.9 versus 62.6 (P<0.001), and forearm 14.8 versus 44.7 (P<0.001). The primary composite outcome occurred in 457/967 (47.3%) patients in the guided care group and 466/974 (47.8%) patients in the usual care group (unadjusted risk ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.08), P=0.83). No secondary outcomes differed significantly between groups. The largest observed difference was in incidence of pneumonia, which was less frequent in the guided care group (88/967, 9.1%) than in the usual care group (121/974, 12.4%) and not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions: Guided care by use of multisite near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring effectively maintained tissue oxygenation near baseline levels compared with usual care. However, no clear evidence was noted that this approach reduced the incidence of major postoperative complications. These findings do not support the routine use of near-infrared spectroscopy and haemodynamic monitoring to maintain tissue oxygenation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Han J, Zhai W, Wu Z, et al. Care guided by tissue oxygenation and haemodynamic monitoring in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (Bottomline-CS): assessor blind, single centre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2025;388:e082104. Published 2025 Mar 24. doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-082104
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
The BMJ
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Final published version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}