Chemical Space Overlap with Critical Protein–Protein Interface Residues in Commercial and Specialized Small-Molecule Libraries

dc.contributor.authorSi, Yubing
dc.contributor.authorXu, David
dc.contributor.authorBum-Erdene, Khuchtumur
dc.contributor.authorGhozayel, Mona K.
dc.contributor.authorYang, Baocheng
dc.contributor.authorClemons, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorMeroueh, Samy O.
dc.contributor.departmentBiochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-04T14:41:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-04T14:41:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-20
dc.description.abstractThere is growing interest in the use of structure-based virtual screening to identify small molecules that inhibit challenging protein–protein interactions (PPIs). In this study, we investigated how effectively chemical library members docked at the PPI interface mimic the position of critical side-chain residues known as “hot spots”. Three compound collections were considered, a commercially available screening collection (ChemDiv), a collection of diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) compounds that contains natural-product-like small molecules, and a library constructed using established reactions (the “screenable chemical universe based on intuitive data organization”, SCUBIDOO). Three different tight PPIs for which hot-spot residues have been identified were selected for analysis: uPAR·uPA, TEAD4·Yap1, and CaVα·CaVβ. Analysis of library physicochemical properties was followed by docking to the PPI receptors. A pharmacophore method was used to measure overlap between small-molecule substituents and hot-spot side chains. Fragment-like conformationally restricted small molecules showed better hot-spot overlap for interfaces with well-defined pockets such as uPAR·uPA, whereas better overlap was observed for more complex DOS compounds in interfaces lacking a well-defined binding site such as TEAD4·Yap1. Virtual screening of conformationally restricted compounds targeting uPAR·uPA and TEAD4·Yap1 followed by experimental validation reinforce these findings, as the best hits were fragment-like and had few rotatable bonds for the former, while no hits were identified for the latter. Overall, such studies provide a framework for understanding PPIs in the context of additional chemical matter and new PPI definitions.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationSi, Y., Xu, D., Bum-Erdene, K., Ghozayel, M. K., Yang, B., Clemons, P. A., & Meroueh, S. O. (2019). Chemical Space Overlap with Critical Protein-Protein Interface Residues in Commercial and Specialized Small-Molecule Libraries. ChemMedChem, 14(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201800537en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22899
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/cmdc.201800537en_US
dc.relation.journalChemMedChemen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCompound librariesen_US
dc.subjectComputational chemistryen_US
dc.subjectProtein–protein interactionsen_US
dc.subjectVirtual screeningen_US
dc.titleChemical Space Overlap with Critical Protein–Protein Interface Residues in Commercial and Specialized Small-Molecule Librariesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms-1012428.pdf
Size:
2.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: