Søren Kierkegaard’s view of faith found in Fear and Trembling and Practice In Christianity
dc.contributor.advisor | Khan, Samuel J.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pulliam, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-18T21:03:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-18T21:03:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09 | |
dc.degree.date | 2016 | en_US |
dc.degree.discipline | Department of Philosophy | en |
dc.degree.grantor | Indiana University | en_US |
dc.degree.level | M.A. | en_US |
dc.description | Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper I discuss two key works written by Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling and Practice in Christianity, under the pseudonyms Johannes de Silentio and Anti-Climacus respectively. I focus on three questions: what is Johannes view of faith, what is Anti-Climacus’ view of faith and how are these Kierkegaard’s conclusions? I argue that stemming from Johannes’ and Anti-Climacus’ points of view, Kierkegaard’s view of faith is the aligning of the self in a trusting relationship with the God-man. One outside of faith can perceive faith to be a paradox or find faith offensive; one must have faith to avoid offense and overcome the paradox. Chapter 1 focuses on the connection between Kierkegaard and his pseudonyms using his work The Point of View. In this chapter I map out Kierkegaard’s method of communication and the purpose for his use of pseudonyms. Chapter 2 focuses on Johannes’ view of faith in Fear and Trembling. Johannes says that faith is formed through a private relationship with God. One with faith is silent about this relationship from the point of view of one who is in the ethical. Johannes understands faith dialectically. Faith is a paradox to Johannes because he does not understand the justification for Abraham’s action. Chapter 3 focuses on Anti-Climacus’ view of faith in Practice in Christianity. Anti-Climacus presents a rigorous account of faith. He says faith is being a contemporary of the God-man and meeting the requirements of believing the God-man’s words. When one becomes a contemporary with the God-man one can become offended by the God-man because the God-man is in collision with the established order, he, as man, claims to be God, he, as God, appears to be man, or the God-man speaks indirectly. Chapter 4 focuses on explaining how Johannes’ and Anti-Climacus’ view complement each other. Out of these two points of view Kierkegaard’s view of faith is the aligning of the self in a trusting relationship with the God-man. One outside of faith can perceive faith to be a paradox or find faith offensive; one must have faith to avoid offense and overcome the paradox. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://doi.org/10.7912/C2KM19 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/11812 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/429 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Søren Kierkegaard | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy of Religion | en_US |
dc.subject | Faith | en_US |
dc.title | Søren Kierkegaard’s view of faith found in Fear and Trembling and Practice In Christianity | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en |