Søren Kierkegaard’s view of faith found in Fear and Trembling and Practice In Christianity

dc.contributor.advisorKhan, Samuel J.M.
dc.contributor.authorPulliam, David
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-18T21:03:07Z
dc.date.available2017-01-18T21:03:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.degree.date2016en_US
dc.degree.disciplineDepartment of Philosophyen
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.A.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I discuss two key works written by Søren Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling and Practice in Christianity, under the pseudonyms Johannes de Silentio and Anti-Climacus respectively. I focus on three questions: what is Johannes view of faith, what is Anti-Climacus’ view of faith and how are these Kierkegaard’s conclusions? I argue that stemming from Johannes’ and Anti-Climacus’ points of view, Kierkegaard’s view of faith is the aligning of the self in a trusting relationship with the God-man. One outside of faith can perceive faith to be a paradox or find faith offensive; one must have faith to avoid offense and overcome the paradox. Chapter 1 focuses on the connection between Kierkegaard and his pseudonyms using his work The Point of View. In this chapter I map out Kierkegaard’s method of communication and the purpose for his use of pseudonyms. Chapter 2 focuses on Johannes’ view of faith in Fear and Trembling. Johannes says that faith is formed through a private relationship with God. One with faith is silent about this relationship from the point of view of one who is in the ethical. Johannes understands faith dialectically. Faith is a paradox to Johannes because he does not understand the justification for Abraham’s action. Chapter 3 focuses on Anti-Climacus’ view of faith in Practice in Christianity. Anti-Climacus presents a rigorous account of faith. He says faith is being a contemporary of the God-man and meeting the requirements of believing the God-man’s words. When one becomes a contemporary with the God-man one can become offended by the God-man because the God-man is in collision with the established order, he, as man, claims to be God, he, as God, appears to be man, or the God-man speaks indirectly. Chapter 4 focuses on explaining how Johannes’ and Anti-Climacus’ view complement each other. Out of these two points of view Kierkegaard’s view of faith is the aligning of the self in a trusting relationship with the God-man. One outside of faith can perceive faith to be a paradox or find faith offensive; one must have faith to avoid offense and overcome the paradox.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.7912/C2KM19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11812
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/429
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSøren Kierkegaarden_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Religionen_US
dc.subjectFaithen_US
dc.titleSøren Kierkegaard’s view of faith found in Fear and Trembling and Practice In Christianityen_US
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pulliam Thesis.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: